In discussions on the exchange plaza, how to find low-risk, high-potential targets in the new cycle is always a topic of concern for investors. Recently, I noticed a phenomenon: projects that can deeply integrate with leading exchanges and have real business support tend to receive significantly more funding and traffic.
The Walrus project is very representative. It didn't rise to fame through hype, but through a series of tangible ecological collaborations—integrating with exchange high-level financial products, jointly launching RWA listing channels, and connecting on-chain liquidity pools—achieving deep binding with top exchanges. As a result, WAL, which was once an obscure small coin in the storage sector, has directly become a focal point for users in the new cycle of the plaza.
From an investment perspective, what is the underlying logic behind this? I will analyze the ecological linkage value, profit scenarios, and how to layout these three dimensions.
**First: Exchange recognition itself is a form of endorsement**
A fundamental logic in the crypto world—endorsement from exchanges is highly valuable. Projects that are deeply integrated into the ecosystem of top exchanges often gain multiple supports: traffic, capital, and resources. The recent surge in WAL's popularity is precisely because of this.
Regarding financial channels: Walrus is one of the few storage projects that can access advanced exchange financial products, which in itself indicates the level of recognition from the exchange regarding the project's credibility. Through financial products, WAL quickly connects with the funds of a vast user base, with pledged scales doubling in the short term, and the circulating supply in the secondary market decreasing significantly. Naturally, this provides strong support for the price trend. It’s important to note how strict top exchanges are in reviewing financial partners—only projects with genuine, compliant, and reliable operations can be selected.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PuzzledScholar
· 01-11 01:51
The exchange's move, to put it simply, is just supporting their own people. WAL can enter the wealth management pool, which shows it's definitely not a small operation, but whether the actual returns can beat inflation still depends on what happens next.
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidator
· 01-10 20:48
Exchange endorsement is essentially a credit endorsement, and that's correct. But the key is to see whether the stability of the validation nodes can keep up after the staking scale doubles — a decrease in circulating supply is a good thing, but what if the node pressure increases?
View OriginalReply0
NFTArtisanHQ
· 01-08 18:58
tbh the whole "exchange endorsement = instant credibility" narrative feels a bit circular to me... like we're conflating liquidity mechanics with actual innovation? walrus might have solid fundamentals but let's not pretend the real value proposition here isn't just capital concentration dressed up as ecosystem synergy
Reply0
AirdropGrandpa
· 01-08 18:34
Exchange endorsement can indeed set the tone, but real business is the hard truth.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 01-08 18:32
Exchange endorsements are natural filters, in simple terms, they save you a lot of due diligence effort.
In discussions on the exchange plaza, how to find low-risk, high-potential targets in the new cycle is always a topic of concern for investors. Recently, I noticed a phenomenon: projects that can deeply integrate with leading exchanges and have real business support tend to receive significantly more funding and traffic.
The Walrus project is very representative. It didn't rise to fame through hype, but through a series of tangible ecological collaborations—integrating with exchange high-level financial products, jointly launching RWA listing channels, and connecting on-chain liquidity pools—achieving deep binding with top exchanges. As a result, WAL, which was once an obscure small coin in the storage sector, has directly become a focal point for users in the new cycle of the plaza.
From an investment perspective, what is the underlying logic behind this? I will analyze the ecological linkage value, profit scenarios, and how to layout these three dimensions.
**First: Exchange recognition itself is a form of endorsement**
A fundamental logic in the crypto world—endorsement from exchanges is highly valuable. Projects that are deeply integrated into the ecosystem of top exchanges often gain multiple supports: traffic, capital, and resources. The recent surge in WAL's popularity is precisely because of this.
Regarding financial channels: Walrus is one of the few storage projects that can access advanced exchange financial products, which in itself indicates the level of recognition from the exchange regarding the project's credibility. Through financial products, WAL quickly connects with the funds of a vast user base, with pledged scales doubling in the short term, and the circulating supply in the secondary market decreasing significantly. Naturally, this provides strong support for the price trend. It’s important to note how strict top exchanges are in reviewing financial partners—only projects with genuine, compliant, and reliable operations can be selected.