The allocation mechanism of the staking pool directly affects the user’s earning experience. If a sufficiently excellent distribution plan can be developed, it has the potential to become an industry benchmark—this idea is not unfounded. In fact, when a platform's staking yield structure is significantly better, other participants often follow quickly, which is also a demonstration of ecological competition driving innovation. The key is who can be the first to find that balance point, providing users with substantial returns while maintaining the long-term healthy operation of the protocol.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashBrownies
· 22h ago
Basically, it's still about the distribution mechanism—whoever has higher returns will go to whoever.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocity
· 22h ago
Basically, it's about competing for returns. The higher the APY, the bigger the winner.
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologist
· 01-08 20:26
The revenue structure has become tangled, but in the end, it still comes down to who can survive longer.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 01-08 19:00
Speaking of which, staking rewards are basically about whose plan is more attractive. When one platform comes up with a good solution, others have to follow suit and compete.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 01-08 19:00
Basically, it's about whose distribution mechanism doesn't cut the leeks, but in reality, it's often the other way around.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanKing
· 01-08 18:59
Basically, it's about who has a more aggressive distribution mechanism, but there are very few that can truly sustain long-term.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 01-08 18:45
That's true, but only a few can truly hold this balance...
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemur
· 01-08 18:44
It's the same old story, how many of these have actually been implemented?
View OriginalReply0
LeverageAddict
· 01-08 18:43
Sounds like just another prelude to a new round of cutting leeks; anyone who believes it is foolish.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 01-08 18:37
Basically, it's about who can be the first to carve out that profit margin; the followers have no chance.
The allocation mechanism of the staking pool directly affects the user’s earning experience. If a sufficiently excellent distribution plan can be developed, it has the potential to become an industry benchmark—this idea is not unfounded. In fact, when a platform's staking yield structure is significantly better, other participants often follow quickly, which is also a demonstration of ecological competition driving innovation. The key is who can be the first to find that balance point, providing users with substantial returns while maintaining the long-term healthy operation of the protocol.