2026-01-08 18:35:00

A recent proposal from a certain Layer 2 network foundation has been put forward: using 50% of the platform revenue to buy back the native tokens. If this proposal is approved, based on current income levels, it could generate approximately $50,000 worth of buying pressure daily—that's still somewhat influential on market sentiment. Interestingly, the majority of this revenue actually comes from contributions by on-chain ecological applications. This kind of token buyback mechanism is quite common during the mature phase of ecosystem development, as it can provide value support to token holders and also help alleviate circulation pressure. Whether it can be implemented ultimately depends on the community voting results.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MevSandwich

· 16h ago

50% buyback? Sounds good, but I'm just worried it might be just talk, and when it comes to actual voting, they'll change their minds. --- The daily buy pressure of $50,000, honestly, is a bit itchy, but it depends on how the community votes. --- The logic of ecosystem applications using the money to buy back tokens... is a bit like self-bleeding. --- Buybacks are a good thing; the key is how they are executed afterward. There are too many lessons from history. --- Another appealing proposal, but once it’s actually implemented, it will probably be a different story. --- This kind of mechanism is essentially giving token holders a second life; how long it can last depends on how the ecosystem business performs.

View OriginalReply0

PortfolioAlert

· 22h ago

Hmm... a purchasing power of $50,000 per day sounds good but not that exaggerated. --- Can buybacks really stabilize the price? The key still depends on whether the ecosystem can truly take off. --- Wait, the income contributed by ecosystem applications is used to buy back tokens, which is an interesting logic. --- Community voting might lead to disputes again. Whether it passes or not, someone will have something to say. --- 50% buyback... what about the remaining 50%? It’s not clearly explained. --- Holders will be happy, but can this really sustain the market long-term, or is it just a short-term positive release? --- It seems that Layer 2 projects all love this approach. How many can actually be implemented?

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 01-10 18:09

The buyback mechanism sounds great, but I'm worried it's just a PPT project. Community voting needs to pass to be valid.

View OriginalReply0

ProtocolRebel

· 01-08 19:05

Haha, another new trick to cut leeks. A 50% buyback sounds pretty cool, but we'll see if the community vote can really pass. --- 50,000 USD purchase pressure? Wow, don’t say it’s thanks to the buyback if the price goes up later. --- Wait, is the main income coming from ecological applications? Well, it depends on whether these applications can still survive. --- I've seen this trick many times; most likely, there will still be discounts in the end. --- It's still good if it really lands; holders can always get some benefits. --- They're just making big promises here. I just want to know if this vote will pass. --- Community voting... do you believe it, or will the Foundation decide again? --- Using application commissions to buy back tokens, basically spending their own money. --- Interesting, but first, we need to see how much vitality is left in this on-chain ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0

ZkProofPudding

· 01-08 19:04

The buyback tactic is real, but the key still depends on how the community votes. Otherwise, even the best proposal is useless.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiHarvester

· 01-08 18:47

Buyback, this routine is almost played out. Hearing $50,000 a day sounds impressive, but what can it really do... --- Here comes the usual trick of cutting the leeks again. Let’s see how the community votes haha --- Wait, is the income from ecosystem applications? That’s basically contributed by us... --- Stop with these empty promises. Real implementation is the hard truth. --- Always claiming buybacks can support the price. I stopped believing in that long ago. --- $50,000 a day sounds intimidating, but the real power is when they start dumping. --- Interesting. If the vote really passes, I want to see the actual effect. --- This kind of mechanism, to put it simply, is using our money to cut us. --- Buybacks, burns, locking... another new story with a different name?

View OriginalReply0

P2ENotWorking

· 01-08 18:42

The buyback mechanism sounds good, but the key is whether the ecosystem applications can support this 50%. --- What can a daily $50,000 buy pressure do? It depends on whether the subsequent ecosystem growth can keep up. --- It's another community vote, but in the end, it's still the big players who have the final say. --- Using the income contributed by the ecosystem to buy back its own tokens feels a bit circular. --- I am optimistic about this direction, but the real test is whether it can attract more applications. --- A 50% buyback sounds impressive, but first, the ecosystem itself needs to prove growth. --- Once the vote passes, it immediately pulls down the price with selling pressure—it's all a trick. --- If the application ecosystem can truly generate continuous income, then this mechanism can operate sustainably. --- Reminds me of a certain public chain's buyback plan last time, which ultimately was a flash in the pan.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoFortuneTeller

· 01-08 18:40

Hey, this buyback mechanism sounds pretty good, but it all depends on how the community votes. The real test is whether they can really put in the $50,000 pressure. Wait, is the main income coming from ecosystem applications? Those app developers need to think it through. Honestly, I'm a bit tempted, but how long the buyback can be sustained is still a question. Self-sustaining ecosystem buyback, this approach is quite interesting. Let's wait for the voting results to come out; right now, it's all just talk. Buyback is buyback, but the key still depends on how the ecosystem itself develops.

View OriginalReply0