Don't repeat the same mistake! Too many people have claimed airdrops and instantly walked away from projects, missing out on real potential and long-term opportunities that could've genuinely benefited them. It's a pattern worth recognizing. Here's my take: approach Inference Labs differently. I'm not hyping this up just for the sake of it—I actually mean it. The difference between missing out and winning often comes down to whether you stick around to see what a project can really become. Sometimes the early supporters who show commitment are the ones who catch the real upside. Do your own research, but don't repeat history.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaoResearcher
· 01-10 19:44
According to the white paper, this phenomenon of "airdrop withdrawal" essentially reflects an incentive incompatibility game equilibrium problem. It is worth noting that... and so on. I especially want to ask: How is the incentive mechanism for early holders specifically designed in Inference Labs' governance proposal? Can token-weighted voting ensure the voting power of long-term holders?
View OriginalReply0
OnChainSleuth
· 01-10 05:57
There are indeed many people who run after airdrops, but the question is, how can they hold on?
View OriginalReply0
token_therapist
· 01-08 18:55
Honestly, only those who can stick with it will make money.
View OriginalReply0
RektDetective
· 01-08 18:49
To be honest, that's how a lot of people are—get the airdrop and run, then watch others make money hahaha
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-08 18:47
Airdrops that just take and run, it's easy to miss big opportunities, but to be honest, I've heard this kind of talk too many times.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 01-08 18:46
Ha, it's the same old lines... I've been tired of them for a long time.
Don't repeat the same mistake! Too many people have claimed airdrops and instantly walked away from projects, missing out on real potential and long-term opportunities that could've genuinely benefited them. It's a pattern worth recognizing. Here's my take: approach Inference Labs differently. I'm not hyping this up just for the sake of it—I actually mean it. The difference between missing out and winning often comes down to whether you stick around to see what a project can really become. Sometimes the early supporters who show commitment are the ones who catch the real upside. Do your own research, but don't repeat history.