Ever wonder why smaller community members get rattled when platforms tighten participation rules?
On the surface, it looks like losing a voice. But dig deeper—it's really about the bet they've made. Months poured into projects like Sentient or Rainbow, hoping these tokens aren't tomorrow's dust.
Here's what matters though: genuinely solid projects don't abandon their early believers when metrics shift. If a project truly needs and values its community, participation thresholds become less of a wall and more of a natural byproduct of growth. Real community resilience shows when the project's fundamentals stay strong.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-9f682d4c
· 6h ago
Nah, it's really just a gambler's mentality... After spending a few months on it, I get nervous when the threshold is raised.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 01-10 15:36
ngl isn't this just a sign of a rug pull... talking about strong fundamentals, but in the end, it's just harvesting a bunch of chives again.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobber
· 01-08 19:45
ngl That's why I never all-in on a project... It seems that whenever the participation rules change, people panic. Actually, it's just that the bets are too heavy.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketNoodler
· 01-08 19:40
Basically, it's just the chips all in moving, causing panic. Genuine projects don't care about the threshold at all; instead, they come to prove that they're still alive.
View OriginalReply0
SudoRm-RfWallet/
· 01-08 19:37
NGL, that's why so many people panic after buying the dip... Isn't the gamble about whether the project can survive?
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuy
· 01-08 19:36
ngl, the early investors indeed got wool pulled over their eyes, but honestly, good projects wouldn't play like that at all.
View OriginalReply0
MevWhisperer
· 01-08 19:35
ngl That's why I never put all my chips into a single project... Early on, I was hoping for double returns, but once the rules changed, I panicked.
Ever wonder why smaller community members get rattled when platforms tighten participation rules?
On the surface, it looks like losing a voice. But dig deeper—it's really about the bet they've made. Months poured into projects like Sentient or Rainbow, hoping these tokens aren't tomorrow's dust.
Here's what matters though: genuinely solid projects don't abandon their early believers when metrics shift. If a project truly needs and values its community, participation thresholds become less of a wall and more of a natural byproduct of growth. Real community resilience shows when the project's fundamentals stay strong.