Honestly, the projects in the crypto space are basically revolving around a few directions—either promoting high TPS, lowering Gas fees, or building cross-chain solutions. But can these really solve the core issues of blockchain adoption? I doubt it. The fundamental bottleneck is actually: how to simultaneously achieve privacy protection and regulatory compliance.
Recently, I’ve been paying close attention to Dusk Foundation and gradually understanding why they chose a route that doesn’t seem as glamorous. This project didn’t follow the trend of hype or chasing hot topics; instead, they focused all their efforts on compliant financial infrastructure. Think about the real-world securities issuance, equity trading, and fund bond markets—people’s demand for privacy and compliance is extremely high—regulators need to review and monitor, ensuring transparency and traceability, while also protecting the business secrets and identities of participants. These two requirements seem contradictory, yet traditional public chains have never figured out how to satisfy both at the same time.
Dusk’s idea is quite straightforward: use cryptographic techniques like zero-knowledge proofs to enable assets on-chain to be verified without revealing private information. With this approach, Security Tokens, RWA, and similar assets have a solid foundational support that is truly usable. This method indeed stands out among many public chains and DeFi projects.
In the long run, this route is unlikely to cause explosive market enthusiasm like those hype-driven projects. However, once regulatory frameworks become clearer and traditional finance truly steps into the on-chain realm, this early positioning will turn into a core competitive advantage.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DiamondHands
· 15h ago
Wow, finally someone dares to expose this truth. The whole TPS and Gas fee story has long been blown out of proportion; the real breakthrough lies in the contradiction between privacy and compliance.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlin
· 01-09 11:21
Talking about Dusk again, but to be fair, it's definitely more reliable than those TPS scam projects.
View OriginalReply0
TokenEconomist
· 01-08 19:50
actually, let me break this down—the privacy-compliance trade-off isn't really a trade-off if you understand zk proofs properly. think of it like traditional banking's audit trails, but cryptographically sealed. most chains totally missed the assignment here.
Reply0
OnchainSniper
· 01-08 19:49
It sounds quite reasonable, but the reality is that most people are still betting on short-term speculation. Who cares about privacy compliance?
I think Dusk is on the right track, although the cycle might be a bit long. People who can't hold on will still sell off.
Zero-knowledge proofs are actually the future direction. For RWA to truly go on-chain, this pain point must be addressed eventually.
View OriginalReply0
LadderToolGuy
· 01-08 19:41
Alright, I have to be honest. TPS, Gas fees, these things have been overhyped for a long time. The real key is who can solve the privacy and compliance challenges.
Dusk has indeed put in effort. Zero-knowledge proofs are quite attractive to traditional finance, but the market still prefers stories that can pump the price. This kind of work is too niche.
Wait, will Security Tokens really take off, or is it just another overhyped concept?
Compliance is a slow process, but once the rules are set, no one can copy them. I have to say, Dusk's early positioning was quite strategic.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 01-08 19:30
Compliance has indeed been seriously underestimated. While everyone is still competing over TPS, Dusk has already been tackling tough problems.
View OriginalReply0
ParallelChainMaxi
· 01-08 19:24
That's right. TPS, Gas, and cross-chain are a set of measures that have been in place for so long but only address the symptoms, not the root cause. I find the Dusk approach becoming more and more appealing.
Honestly, the projects in the crypto space are basically revolving around a few directions—either promoting high TPS, lowering Gas fees, or building cross-chain solutions. But can these really solve the core issues of blockchain adoption? I doubt it. The fundamental bottleneck is actually: how to simultaneously achieve privacy protection and regulatory compliance.
Recently, I’ve been paying close attention to Dusk Foundation and gradually understanding why they chose a route that doesn’t seem as glamorous. This project didn’t follow the trend of hype or chasing hot topics; instead, they focused all their efforts on compliant financial infrastructure. Think about the real-world securities issuance, equity trading, and fund bond markets—people’s demand for privacy and compliance is extremely high—regulators need to review and monitor, ensuring transparency and traceability, while also protecting the business secrets and identities of participants. These two requirements seem contradictory, yet traditional public chains have never figured out how to satisfy both at the same time.
Dusk’s idea is quite straightforward: use cryptographic techniques like zero-knowledge proofs to enable assets on-chain to be verified without revealing private information. With this approach, Security Tokens, RWA, and similar assets have a solid foundational support that is truly usable. This method indeed stands out among many public chains and DeFi projects.
In the long run, this route is unlikely to cause explosive market enthusiasm like those hype-driven projects. However, once regulatory frameworks become clearer and traditional finance truly steps into the on-chain realm, this early positioning will turn into a core competitive advantage.