Production security failures—most are entirely preventable, yet teams keep making the same mistakes.
The real issue? Security reviews are treated as optional checkpoints rather than mandatory gates. When you skip them, you're not just cutting corners on process; you're rolling the dice with your entire system.
Here's the thing: the difference between a secure deployment and a catastrophic breach often comes down to whether someone actually reviewed the code, the infrastructure, and the attack surface before going live.
Make security reviews non-negotiable. It's not bureaucracy—it's the baseline.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasGuzzler
· 7h ago
It's the same old story... but honestly, some teams just don't listen to advice and only regret it after something goes wrong.
View OriginalReply0
probably_nothing_anon
· 01-08 19:59
Honestly, it's really frustrating that the team keeps making the same mistakes. Skipping security review is like going live naked; sooner or later, you'll suffer the consequences.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorker
· 01-08 19:56
To be honest, most teams treat security reviews as a joke and only panic when something goes wrong.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallenger
· 01-08 19:56
Ironically, big companies spend millions on audits every year, while small teams skip even reviews, and in the end, everyone falls into the same trap.
Data speaks: 98% of security vulnerabilities could have been detected during code review, but they still made it online.
It's not the first time; haven't we learned from the DAO incident in 2016?
The problem isn't the tools; it's that the team simply doesn't take security seriously, treating mandatory measures as optional. This mindset is toxic.
Historical lessons show that every project claiming "this time is different" ultimately crashes in the same place.
View OriginalReply0
FlatTax
· 01-08 19:55
Honestly, this is a classic case of the "We don't have time" syndrome, and only regretting it after it blows up.
View OriginalReply0
StakeOrRegret
· 01-08 19:52
To be honest, those teams that mess up the production environment are just rushing. Skipping security review is like driving on the highway without wearing a seatbelt—relying on luck...
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighbor
· 01-08 19:36
Basically, it's just laziness. Even after the review process is completed, they still skip it out of laziness... and only cry for help when something goes wrong.
Production security failures—most are entirely preventable, yet teams keep making the same mistakes.
The real issue? Security reviews are treated as optional checkpoints rather than mandatory gates. When you skip them, you're not just cutting corners on process; you're rolling the dice with your entire system.
Here's the thing: the difference between a secure deployment and a catastrophic breach often comes down to whether someone actually reviewed the code, the infrastructure, and the attack surface before going live.
Make security reviews non-negotiable. It's not bureaucracy—it's the baseline.