2026-01-08 19:32:16

Technical trading course fee of $50? An expensive investment with no guaranteed results. Instead, futures loss $100 in a single transaction? That's what you call real market experience. This is a classic example of how traders can get caught in a cycle of repeated losses throughout their careers—learning theory without disciplined practice, or jumping in directly without a solid foundation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SpeakWithHatOn

· 3h ago

Haha, this is us. Think twice about the $50 course, and there's nothing to say about losing $100 in one go—it's especially exciting.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichTrader

· 11h ago

This argument is correct; a $50 course can't compare to the experience of losing $100 in a single shot... but it's not to say you should go all-in blindly.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapist

· 01-09 03:10

ngl $50 course vs $100 loss is the same lie 😂 the only difference is whether your skill holder is capable or not, just theory is useless bro

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationKing

· 01-08 20:02

$50 course vs losing $100 on a trade, this comparison is really hilarious haha --- It's the same old story of the theoretical type vs the reckless type, I've seen it all --- Honestly, trading without discipline is more deadly than lacking knowledge --- Losing $100 is just tuition, I believe that, but only if you've truly learned something --- Here we go, spending money on courses to learn nothing, not spending money to lose everything, both are scams --- Look carefully, the problem isn't with $50 or $100 , it's whether your brain is filled with stuff or not

View OriginalReply0

YieldWhisperer

· 01-08 19:57

Is a 50-dollar course expensive? Losing 100 dollars is the real experience? That logic is ridiculous, buddy. --- It's that old debate of theory versus practice again, hilarious. --- Not willing to spend 50 dollars on a course, but losing 100 dollars feels especially satisfying—typical. --- Jumping straight into action without learning the theory is truly a suicide mission in trading. --- You're just making excuses for your reckless operations, haha. --- The key is still missing a complete trading system; both are lacking. --- Three years of futures trading and this is the summary? --- $50 course vs. $100 loss, the cost structure is completely reversed. --- It sounds like you're just defending reverse trading strategies.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketTeam

· 01-08 19:43

Damn, this is a classic "burning money tuition" package, losing 100 first and then talking [rocket]

View OriginalReply0

PessimisticLayer

· 01-08 19:34

Afraid of losing money on a 50-yuan course, but then lose 100 with a single move... Who came up with this logic? Really, going straight into practice without learning the theory? No wonder the market teaches you a lesson. Courses are a trap, but reckless growth isn't the answer either—it's just that no one wants to do things properly.

View OriginalReply0