2026-01-08 19:36:17

The separation of fee mechanisms between the application layer and the chain layer in Monad is really well done. In fact, this is the direction the entire crypto ecosystem should move towards.

Think about it—if users pay more fees at the application layer, this value will ultimately flow into the entire ecosystem. Application developers earn revenue, the chain is supported, and user experience can also be improved—only then can a virtuous cycle be formed. Not all costs should be borne by the chain layer. Monad's approach is worth learning from for other public chains.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HodlKumamon

· 01-11 17:44

Splitting the fee mechanism this way is indeed clever, and data shows that the profit distribution curve for ecosystem participants can be much more stable.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationKing

· 01-11 14:19

The fee splitting mechanism is indeed ingenious; only a thriving ecosystem is truly valuable.

View OriginalReply0

PrivateKeyParanoia

· 01-09 22:18

Hey, finally someone has explained this thoroughly. The fee layering approach is indeed the way out; the previous model that relied entirely on the chain layer really couldn't hold up.

View OriginalReply0

TerraNeverForget

· 01-08 20:05

Someone finally explained it thoroughly; fee tiering really has to be played this way.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-26d7f434

· 01-08 20:00

Speaking of which, this fee stratification is really awesome. Finally, a public chain has thought this through. The application layer sustains itself, without burdening the chain — this logic makes perfect sense. The Monad approach should be widely adopted. When will other public chains learn? It’s long overdue; only then can the ecosystem truly come alive. This is what system design should be, not just thinking about how to exploit users.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityHunter

· 01-08 19:59

Saw this at 2 AM and suddenly thought of a question... The application layer fee flows to the developer, so does the slippage optimization space also get eaten up? Need to precisely calculate the liquidity depth changes of the entire trading pair.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 01-08 19:56

Forget it, you still need to look at on-chain data to speak. Just listening to concepts alone makes it easy to get cut.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 01-08 19:54

It should have been done this way a long time ago; it's too absurd that the chain layer has been taking all the blame.

View OriginalReply0

FallingLeaf

· 01-08 19:51

Wow, this idea is indeed brilliant. Finally, a public chain has figured out this approach.

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinMarathoner

· 01-08 19:49

yeah this fee split architecture monad's doing... it's basically the marathon strategy for sustainable ecosystems. been accumulating exposure since these fundamentals started clicking into place. most chains are still sprinting (burning out), monad's playing the long game

Reply0