2026-01-08 20:22:14

Many new Web3 users actually don't realize a key issue—data storage. It's easy to say, but this thing is really bottlenecking large-scale blockchain applications.

What Walrus is doing is very interesting. Currently, on-chain data storage is expensive and inefficient, and developers spend a lot of effort just handling these infrastructure issues. Project teams are unable to focus on product iteration.

Walrus's approach is different—by optimizing data availability design, it improves both storage costs and performance. This allows developers to truly focus on application layer innovation. From this perspective, $WAL is not just a transaction token, but a necessary component for the operation of the entire underlying network.

If you're interested in blockchain infrastructure, this direction is definitely worth exploring further.

WAL-0,06%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SatoshiNotNakamoto

· 14h ago

Data storage has indeed been a seriously overlooked pitfall; many people are only thinking about trading cryptocurrencies.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeWhisperer

· 01-11 05:21

To be honest, I didn't pay much attention to storage before, until I was frustrated by high gas fees... The Walrus perspective is somewhat interesting, but it also feels like a "change the world next year" promise. Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 01-11 03:00

Wow, storage is truly a no-man's land. Everyone is hyping applications and DeFi, but no one remembers that on-chain data is piling up into mountains. Really, watching Walrus's approach makes me understand what it means to seize the pain point... Developers are being tortured by infrastructure. Wait, can $WAL really support such a large imagination space? Or is it just another infrastructure dream?

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeOnChain

· 01-10 02:07

Storage costs are indeed the hidden killer; many people didn't expect that. Honestly, I believe in the Walrus approach; the infrastructure must be laid first.

View OriginalReply0

0xDreamChaser

· 01-08 20:52

Data storage has indeed been underestimated; everyone is talking about fancy applications at the application layer, and no one wants to hear about the nitty-gritty of infrastructure. Honestly, if Walrus can really reduce costs, the ecosystem could be liberated to develop more interesting things. But it still depends on real TPS data. I'll keep observing whether $WAL is worth this price; infrastructure tokens are generally easily forgotten.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleMinion

· 01-08 20:50

To be honest, data storage has indeed been seriously underestimated. Everyone is just thinking about trading coins; who really cares about infrastructure? I think the idea behind Walrus is still somewhat interesting, and the approach to solving pain points is correct. However, ultimately, $WAL still depends on whether they can actually reduce costs.

View OriginalReply0

DAOTruant

· 01-08 20:47

To be honest, I didn't really understand data storage before, but now I get it instantly. I have to admit that the Walrus idea really hits the pain point, and developers are indeed tortured by these infrastructure issues. However, whether $WAL can really take off depends on how the ecosystem develops; having ideas alone is not enough. The competition in the underlying infrastructure track is fierce. Can Walrus really break through? It feels a bit uncertain. Projects like this often take 3 years to succeed and can reset in 3 days. I still need to observe more before making any conclusions.

View OriginalReply0

Deconstructionist

· 01-08 20:44

I've really been stuck on data storage for so long, why is it only now that someone is seriously working on this? Wait, I don't quite understand the logic behind $WAL. Can it really reduce costs, or is it just a hype concept? Reducing storage costs allows developers to breathe easier, I agree with that, but why can Walrus do what others can't? Finally, someone has noticed the infrastructure aspect. Too many people only focus on the superficial application layer hype.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentLossFan

· 01-08 20:32

Data storage is indeed a blind spot for most people, and that's correct. However, whether Walrus can truly solve the cost issue depends on its implementation.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedThrice

· 01-08 20:28

Data storage is indeed an invisible killer; most people haven't thought it through. That's right, now on-chain storage is ridiculously expensive, and developers are exhausted just building the basic infrastructure. I'm optimistic about the Walrus approach—bringing down costs so developers have the bandwidth to pursue real innovation. The value of $WAL isn't in hype; it's solid support for the actual network infrastructure.

View OriginalReply0