The progress of Ranger ICO's first phase subscription seems slow, with only 50% completed. However, when compared to historical projects within the Metadao ecosystem, the situation might be different.
Let's look at some reference project data: a privacy project with a minimum funding target of $7.5 million actually raised $154 million, oversubscribed by 205 times. Another DeFi project with an even larger initial funding goal of $20 million had equally enthusiastic subscription activity.
What do these data indicate? The user base and market recognition accumulated within the Metadao ecosystem far surpass those of typical new projects. Conversely, the current subscription pace of Ranger may precisely suggest that participants are more rational and cautious rather than lacking enthusiasm.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SingleForYears
· 21h ago
This does seem to make some sense; previously, those projects all rushed in blindly, but now they are more cautious.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdrop
· 21h ago
50% progress is okay. Compared to projects that finish instantly, it actually shows that everyone is really thinking... The 205x oversubscription data is truly outrageous. Who would still play like that now?
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghost
· 01-08 20:31
Hmm... Is slow progress a sign of rationality? That logic is a bit far-fetched.
The data from the first two projects are indeed exaggerated, but it also indicates that the market has already entered a frenzy stage. Being cautious now is actually a normal reaction.
However, Ranger's current pace really lacks presence. Hopefully, it can make a breakthrough later on.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 01-08 20:28
Wait a minute, 50% progress is still called slow? Look at the data from historical projects in the ecosystem, overfunded by more than 200 times... This time, Ranger actually appears to be more calm; participants not being so crazy is actually a good thing.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationOracle
· 01-08 20:27
50% progress is slow? Compared to those crazy 205x oversubscriptions, this actually shows that people are starting to think.
The progress of Ranger ICO's first phase subscription seems slow, with only 50% completed. However, when compared to historical projects within the Metadao ecosystem, the situation might be different.
Let's look at some reference project data: a privacy project with a minimum funding target of $7.5 million actually raised $154 million, oversubscribed by 205 times. Another DeFi project with an even larger initial funding goal of $20 million had equally enthusiastic subscription activity.
What do these data indicate? The user base and market recognition accumulated within the Metadao ecosystem far surpass those of typical new projects. Conversely, the current subscription pace of Ranger may precisely suggest that participants are more rational and cautious rather than lacking enthusiasm.