Tokens don't have to be about making money. Their real potential lies in solving actual problems for creators and communities.
Consider the mechanics: tokens can replace traditional subscription walls entirely, giving holders direct access to content or services. In open-source ecosystems, they enable fee-sharing models that reward contributors fairly without intermediaries. For usage-based applications and indie games, they create lightweight economic layers that scale naturally. When governance actually matters—not just token-holder voting theater—they facilitate real decision-making in decentralized networks.
The flexibility is crucial here. Creators retain full autonomy. Want to use tokens? Great. Prefer traditional models? That's equally valid. The technology should serve the use case, not the other way around.
This philosophy shifts how we think about incentive design in Web3 projects and decentralized platforms.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PessimisticOracle
· 01-09 14:13
Alright, another motivational article saying "tokens are not for speculation"... It sounds nice, but would truly creative people be willing to give up this stable cash flow from subscriptions? I have my reservations.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSunriser
· 01-09 13:22
Hey, someone finally said it. The crypto world is all about hype and issuing tokens, but it's just a different way of scamming people out of their money.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiNotNakamoto
· 01-09 08:52
ngl this is what I want to hear, many projects are still just speculating on coins... truly useful token design should have been thought of this way long ago
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAutomaton
· 01-08 21:00
To be honest, most people are still thinking about how to use tokens to harvest profits. This can be considered a wake-up call. But the problem is, there are very few projects that truly use tokens to solve real problems... I can't see many.
View OriginalReply0
tx_pending_forever
· 01-08 20:59
Hmm... finally someone has clarified this. Not all tokens have to be the key to wealth.
View OriginalReply0
FudVaccinator
· 01-08 20:48
Hmm... it's the same old story. Truly useful token projects are scarce to the point of being pitiful.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 01-08 20:41
To be honest, I've heard too many token salvation theories over the years... but this article is pretty good, at least it doesn't hype it up as a cure-all miracle. What's really interesting is the phrase "technology serving use cases." On the flip side, how many of our current projects are use cases accommodating technology?
View OriginalReply0
StrawberryIce
· 01-08 20:35
Hey, no, finally someone said this. Everyone always treats tokens as an ATM, never really thinking about what they can actually do.
View OriginalReply0
FastLeaver
· 01-08 20:33
Oh no, another article claiming that tokens are not purely for scamming new investors. How rare.
Finally, someone is telling the truth—tokens are just tools, not something to constantly think about how to pump.
I really support the subscription model; bypassing middlemen directly is indeed refreshing.
But... to put it nicely, how many projects can truly achieve fair distribution? Most are just changing masks to continue scamming.
Beyond speculation: rethinking token utility
Tokens don't have to be about making money. Their real potential lies in solving actual problems for creators and communities.
Consider the mechanics: tokens can replace traditional subscription walls entirely, giving holders direct access to content or services. In open-source ecosystems, they enable fee-sharing models that reward contributors fairly without intermediaries. For usage-based applications and indie games, they create lightweight economic layers that scale naturally. When governance actually matters—not just token-holder voting theater—they facilitate real decision-making in decentralized networks.
The flexibility is crucial here. Creators retain full autonomy. Want to use tokens? Great. Prefer traditional models? That's equally valid. The technology should serve the use case, not the other way around.
This philosophy shifts how we think about incentive design in Web3 projects and decentralized platforms.