2026-01-08 20:32:19

Privacy-focused coins are entering an interesting phase, and some emerging players are catching attention for good reason. What makes the difference? A fully functional privacy DEX that actually lets users participate in token launches with genuine anonymity protection.

Consider the mechanics: you've got a working product already generating revenue, a market cap that hasn't exploded yet, and infrastructure that competitors are still building. The privacy DEX angle changes everything—it's not just another privacy token, it's a platform solving real user needs in the trading space.

At current valuations, the math is compelling. A $500m+ market cap product with actual utility and revenue streams has more than speculative appeal. This is the kind of infrastructure play that tends to attract both retail and institutional interest once people recognize what's already functioning beneath the surface. The narrative around privacy in decentralized trading is just getting started.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoSourGrape

· 22h ago

I should have known earlier. I should have gone all in on privacy coins instead of throwing everything into those crappy clones... Now seeing their $500 million market cap still undervalued, I really regret it to the core.

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 01-11 16:01

Privacy DEXs indeed have potential, but claiming "just the beginning" with a $500 million valuation sounds a bit overly optimistic... --- Will institutional investors really buy into anonymous trading, or is that just retail fantasy? --- No matter how good the pitch, it depends on actual trading volume. Having infrastructure alone is useless if no one uses it. --- Privacy coins are always under regulatory scrutiny; this fundamental issue is problematic. --- Wait, are we talking about a specific project or privacy DEXs in general? The article seems a bit vague. --- What is the revenue source? If it's just transaction fees, there's no fundamental difference from centralized exchanges. --- Honestly, privacy needs do exist, but will genuine institutional clients use this stuff? That's questionable. --- Market cap is only 500 million and still at the bottom? What are you waiting for? Why not go all in? --- Infrastructure is under construction = not finished yet, so how can you start storytelling? --- It feels a bit like marketing brainwashing, but I have to admit this perspective is indeed deeper than ordinary privacy coins.

View OriginalReply0

LayerHopper

· 01-09 21:12

Privacy DEX is indeed a direction, but only those who survive regulation will be the winners.

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 01-08 21:02

Privacy DEX is a real track, but don't be fooled by the 500 million market cap. The key is still the actual adoption rate by users. --- Honestly, privacy coins have always been a pseudo-demand, unless exchanges rely on anonymity to survive. --- Why does this logic remind me of last year's NFT narrative... What’s left now? --- Wait, are there privacy DEXs with actual revenue? How will regulators handle that? Or is it just another legal gray area? --- Will institutions really get involved with this? Why aren’t big funds coming in? --- Saying that the underlying infrastructure is already in operation sounds a bit vague. Can you provide some specific data?

View OriginalReply0

bridgeOops

· 01-08 21:02

Privacy DEX is really not just hype; it feels like infrastructure is the future.

View OriginalReply0

MoodFollowsPrice

· 01-08 21:02

Privacy DEX is really a great story, but is it already too late to get in now...

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-75ee51e7

· 01-08 21:02

Haha, privacy DEXs are indeed interesting, but with a market cap of 500 million, haven't they exploded yet? --- Wait, are there really people using these privacy exchanges? Or is it just another hype? --- Starting to tell stories while the infrastructure is still under construction, this routine feels a bit familiar. --- Are the revenue sources reliable? Don’t tell me it’s just another name for an air coin. --- The demand for privacy transactions definitely exists, it all depends on who can really deliver. --- With a market cap of only 500 million, dare to say there’s speculative value? The risk is huge. --- Another story with "the narrative just beginning," I’m tired of hearing this phrase. --- Brothers, don’t be fooled. First, check if there’s real trading volume before talking. --- Have you ever thought about what the endgame for privacy coins is? --- These types of projects are often made by many but used by few.

View OriginalReply0

screenshot_gains

· 01-08 20:52

Nah, this is the real infrastructure. Once privacy DEXs are rolled out, it will truly be different. Wait, so the current $500 million market cap hasn't taken off yet? Then I need to do some research... Honestly, infrastructure projects are always easily underestimated; retail investors simply can't understand them. The combination of privacy + exchanges feels like something that should have been done a long time ago. I'm not surprised at all if privacy coins turn around in this cycle.

View OriginalReply0

BitcoinDaddy

· 01-08 20:42

Can privacy DEX really become popular? It seems like the market still has too many concept coins, and there are hardly any that actually generate profits.

View OriginalReply0

MintMaster

· 01-08 20:37

Privacy DEX indeed has potential, but I don't know if it will really take off. Wait, a market cap of 500 million and still claiming it's just the beginning? Feels a bit exaggerated. Infrastructure projects like this are indeed often underestimated, but haven't they considered the regulatory risks in the privacy sector? NGL, will institutions cut a deal before retail investors enter... Infrastructure under construction is being valued so highly, it's a bit confusing.

View OriginalReply0