In the collision between blockchain and traditional finance, there is an unavoidable issue—how to find a balance between privacy protection and regulatory requirements.
An interesting attempt comes from a Layer 1 project that started back in 2018. This chain has focused from the very beginning on a niche track: financial infrastructure built for compliance and privacy. Its approach is straightforward—through a modular architecture, it provides underlying support for institutional-grade financial applications, compliant DeFi, and real-world asset tokenization, while embedding privacy protection and auditability into the protocol design. This focused positioning makes it stand out among many projects and has attracted the attention of traditional financial institutions.
Recently, this project's ecosystem has been very active. In the second week of January, its EVM-compatible application layer will go live on the mainnet—an important development to watch. This layer allows developers to directly deploy standard Solidity contracts while relying on the main chain for final settlement. It sounds simple but is highly significant: the technical barriers to cross-ecosystem integration are gone, and the development costs for compliant DeFi and RWA applications are greatly reduced. For ecosystem expansion, this is key to attracting additional developers and projects.
Regarding the balance between privacy and auditability, the project is also advancing the refinement and application of solutions like Hedger. These details may seem insignificant, but they precisely reflect the project's ongoing consideration of the difficult problem of "privacy and compliance at the same time."
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FlashLoanKing
· 01-11 18:06
Compliance and privacy are truly an eternal contradiction... but this guy's thinking is indeed quite interesting.
Finding a balance between privacy protection and regulatory requirements sounds simple, but actually doing it is really difficult. However, this Layer 1 seems to be seriously contemplating this issue.
Modular architecture + EVM compatibility, reducing development costs—I see that, but I don't know if the ecosystem can really take off.
Wanting both privacy and compliance is like having your cake and eating it too... but if it can really be achieved, traditional finance will definitely be on board.
It's quite interesting; we'll keep an eye on the developments of this chain.
This focused track choice still has some potential; it all depends on whether it can be implemented later.
View OriginalReply0
StableGeniusDegen
· 01-11 11:27
Privacy and regulation are really a deadlock. I think this approach is pretty good, but how far it can go remains to be seen.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 01-09 20:36
Oh no, it's that old tune of privacy compliance again. Can it really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
ProveMyZK
· 01-08 22:51
Privacy and compliance are really just a false proposition; ultimately, compromises are necessary. However, this EVM-compatible layer approach is quite interesting, especially in reducing development costs, which hits a key pain point.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctor
· 01-08 22:50
The consultation record shows that the clinical performance of this chain is indeed worth observing—the combination of modular architecture and privacy design, in theory, has no issues. But the question is: after the EVM compatibility layer goes live, can it truly attract institutional-level applications to land, or is it just another "ecosystem prosperity" illusion? It is recommended to regularly review the actual data of TVL and contract deployments.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizard
· 01-08 22:50
I've said it before, privacy and compliance are two guys you can't serve at the same time. Now finally, someone dares to bite this hard bone.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 01-08 22:49
Hmm... once again privacy + compliance, sounds too good to be true. But what's the reality?
View OriginalReply0
ChainDetective
· 01-08 22:49
Hey, this is exactly what I've been wanting to see. Privacy and regulation finally don't have to be at odds anymore.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAO
· 01-08 22:30
Wait, can privacy and compliance really coexist? It feels like walking a tightrope.
In the collision between blockchain and traditional finance, there is an unavoidable issue—how to find a balance between privacy protection and regulatory requirements.
An interesting attempt comes from a Layer 1 project that started back in 2018. This chain has focused from the very beginning on a niche track: financial infrastructure built for compliance and privacy. Its approach is straightforward—through a modular architecture, it provides underlying support for institutional-grade financial applications, compliant DeFi, and real-world asset tokenization, while embedding privacy protection and auditability into the protocol design. This focused positioning makes it stand out among many projects and has attracted the attention of traditional financial institutions.
Recently, this project's ecosystem has been very active. In the second week of January, its EVM-compatible application layer will go live on the mainnet—an important development to watch. This layer allows developers to directly deploy standard Solidity contracts while relying on the main chain for final settlement. It sounds simple but is highly significant: the technical barriers to cross-ecosystem integration are gone, and the development costs for compliant DeFi and RWA applications are greatly reduced. For ecosystem expansion, this is key to attracting additional developers and projects.
Regarding the balance between privacy and auditability, the project is also advancing the refinement and application of solutions like Hedger. These details may seem insignificant, but they precisely reflect the project's ongoing consideration of the difficult problem of "privacy and compliance at the same time."