Having worked in the financial industry for years, I have seen many projects struggle to balance privacy and compliance—some end up on the fringes of regulation to protect privacy; others, in an effort to please regulators, simply abandon privacy altogether, making them no different from traditional financial systems. It wasn't until I learned about the DUSK project that I realized there is a third possibility: integrating privacy and auditability from the ground up, allowing Layer 1 blockchains to become truly suitable infrastructure for regulated financial markets.
Today, I want to analyze this project, which was born in 2018, from three perspectives—why traditional financial systems need it, how it achieves this technically, and what real-world implementation looks like.
**1. The Deadlock Between Privacy and Regulation**
Just look at how traditional finance operates. Banks tightly guard your transaction information but still need to cooperate with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing checks; institutional investors conducting large trades don’t want details leaked prematurely to affect the market, yet they must also clarify the compliance of their transactions to regulators. These two needs seem contradictory, but some entities manage to satisfy both simultaneously.
When blockchain technology entered the scene, this balance was shattered. Bitcoin offers anonymity, but regulators have no way to control it, and it’s often seen as an outsider to the financial system; platforms like Ethereum, with their transparent transaction records, are fully transparent—leaving no privacy at all.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletAnxietyPatient
· 01-11 03:44
Privacy and compliance are really a vicious cycle. The idea behind DUSK is interesting, but I still need to see the code to believe how it's actually implemented.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter
· 01-08 22:50
Privacy and compliance are really a dead end. After so many years in the crypto world, we still haven't figured it out... The idea behind DUSK is somewhat interesting, let's keep an eye on it.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersPaper
· 01-08 22:36
You're trying to fool us again, huh? Can privacy and compliance really go hand in hand? I think this is just another set of talking points; in the end, we're still going to get cut.
View OriginalReply0
ApyWhisperer
· 01-08 22:36
Honestly, privacy and compliance are just false propositions. Traditional finance has been around for hundreds of years and hasn't truly solved these issues; it relies on information asymmetry and monopoly of power. If DUSK's system can truly be integrated at the underlying level... then it really has some potential.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 01-08 22:23
The seeds planted in 2018 are only now being recognized... This is truly on-chain archaeology.
Having worked in the financial industry for years, I have seen many projects struggle to balance privacy and compliance—some end up on the fringes of regulation to protect privacy; others, in an effort to please regulators, simply abandon privacy altogether, making them no different from traditional financial systems. It wasn't until I learned about the DUSK project that I realized there is a third possibility: integrating privacy and auditability from the ground up, allowing Layer 1 blockchains to become truly suitable infrastructure for regulated financial markets.
Today, I want to analyze this project, which was born in 2018, from three perspectives—why traditional financial systems need it, how it achieves this technically, and what real-world implementation looks like.
**1. The Deadlock Between Privacy and Regulation**
Just look at how traditional finance operates. Banks tightly guard your transaction information but still need to cooperate with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing checks; institutional investors conducting large trades don’t want details leaked prematurely to affect the market, yet they must also clarify the compliance of their transactions to regulators. These two needs seem contradictory, but some entities manage to satisfy both simultaneously.
When blockchain technology entered the scene, this balance was shattered. Bitcoin offers anonymity, but regulators have no way to control it, and it’s often seen as an outsider to the financial system; platforms like Ethereum, with their transparent transaction records, are fully transparent—leaving no privacy at all.