2026-01-08 22:22:37

A well-known trading platform has announced the delisting of certain trading pairs. According to the announcement, the TRISIG and FXS trading pairs will be officially delisted on January 8th (UTC+8).

The platform reminds users to proactively close their positions before automatic liquidation and to withdraw funds from these trading pairs in a timely manner. This is part of the routine trading pair adjustment process— as market conditions change, exchanges regularly review the quality of trading pairs and delist tokens with insufficient liquidity or higher risks.

It is recommended that users holding positions in these trading pairs take action as soon as possible to avoid losses from forced liquidation. A complete list of previously delisted trading pairs can be found in the official announcement.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MultiSigFailMaster

· 01-11 20:38

Offline again and again, this platform really can't stay idle

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 01-11 11:09

The consultation records show that the liquidity indicators for these two tokens have already turned red, with obvious signs of capital outflow. The platform's recent actions can be considered timely risk warnings. The problem is, why do these offline lists always require users to dig them up themselves? Can't they just provide a summary table directly? This is a typical case where protocol code vulnerabilities are transformed into user experience issues.

View OriginalReply0

NftMetaversePainter

· 01-09 04:49

actually, the algorithmic liquidation mechanics here are precisely why we need to rethink exchange architecture through a blockchain primitive lens... the hash value of risk management in these legacy systems is fundamentally flawed, tbh

Reply0

GasDevourer

· 01-08 22:52

Here we go again, being forcibly liquidated again. It's really annoying.

View OriginalReply0

PancakeFlippa

· 01-08 22:52

Here we go again, about to run away and clear out the holdings. These two cryptocurrencies are really beyond saving.

View OriginalReply0

Layer3Dreamer

· 01-08 22:50

theoretically speaking, if we map the delisting mechanics onto a cross-rollup state verification framework... the forced liquidation is basically what happens when your bridge function B fails to reconcile L2 commitments, ngl. positions getting wiped = recursive SNARK breakdown. anyway, exit before the clearinghouse executes or you're toast

Reply0

ser_ngmi