2026-01-08 22:35:18

Currently, most wallet products share the same problem—placing too much burden on users. Network configuration is complex, security vulnerabilities are numerous and hard to prevent, smart contract risks are difficult to identify, and functionalities are always missing this or that. The most outrageous part is that even simple operations can become a mess.

But the idea of new types of wallets is beginning to change this situation. Instead of positioning wallets as passive signing tools, it’s better to make them smarter and more proactive in protecting users. Product design shifts from "users learn to use the tool" to "tools actively adapt to users," which is the future direction of Web3 wallets.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PoolJumper

· 14h ago

It's profound, finally someone has spoken out. --- Honestly, using a wallet now is like playing Minesweeper. --- This is the direction I've been waiting for all along. --- Tool adaptation for users? Dreaming, or is it really happening? --- Totally agree, new wallets can't keep passing the buck to users anymore. --- Just worried it's another empty promise; let's wait and see the implementation. --- I've been scammed too many times, half in doubt. --- Contract risk identification must be prioritized. --- The wallet should understand me, not the other way around.

View OriginalReply0

FlippedSignal

· 01-10 15:29

That's right, wallets have really complicated things now. Proactive protection should have been implemented long ago, wake up everyone. Who can truly excel in contract risk identification? Old wallets should step back, honestly. Waiting to be "adapted," don't just talk, take action.

View OriginalReply0

MissedTheBoat

· 01-08 23:05

That's right, wallets are really getting a bit outrageous now. It's mainly about how to earn transaction fees; user experience and all that don't really matter. Wait, how can we actively protect users in this context?

View OriginalReply0

MainnetDelayedAgain

· 01-08 23:01

According to the database, this kind of "revolutionary plan" has been hyped for 626 days, and we still have to wait for the last promised "future direction" to materialize. It is recommended to include it in the Guinness World Records.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrying

· 01-08 22:58

Damn, wallets really make people frustrated now. Exactly, the transition is too slow. Finally, someone understands my pain points. Smart contracts carry risks that are off the charts. Tools should proactively adapt instead of passing the buck to users. This is the right way, looking forward to real changes. It should have been like this long ago; why bother complicating things for users?

View OriginalReply0

ForkTrooper

· 01-08 22:52

You're so right, using wallets nowadays is really exhausting. This is the direction I want—proactive protection is the most practical. Finally, someone dares to speak out, it really needs to change. Old wallets are really annoying, always have to worry. Tools should adapt to users, this idea is brilliant. Complex things still need to be learned by oneself, who can handle that? Yeah, security is really a tough test. Proactively protecting users is the way to go, looking forward to it. The old system is really outdated. Simple operations have been messed up, it's ridiculous.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseHermit

· 01-08 22:51

I totally agree, the wallet experience is really terrible now. Exactly, someone finally pointed it out. Tools should adapt to people, not people forcing themselves to learn tools. This is the kind of product thinking we should have. The old wallet approach really needs to be phased out.

View OriginalReply0