2026-01-08 22:34:56

Been looking at the funding numbers on this one and something doesn't quite add up. They're claiming $108M in the round, but the check sizes from their typical backers don't seem to math out. Makes you wonder if there's some debt financing mixed in there, or if the total is being counted differently than usual. The gap between what you'd expect from their standard investor roster and the final number is pretty noticeable.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainArchaeologist

· 01-11 09:58

108M? The number doesn't add up. The investor list doesn't match. I've seen this trick before.

View OriginalReply0

LadderToolGuy

· 01-10 06:02

108M? The number doesn't seem right; I've seen this trick too many times.

View OriginalReply0

rekt_but_vibing

· 01-08 23:05

108M sounds good, but the numbers don't add up... Is there a mole?

View OriginalReply0

airdrop_huntress

· 01-08 23:03

The numbers don't add up. The figure of 108M also looks quite off to me... Feels like some investors' checks just don't add up? Debt financing has been mixed in, right? I've seen this trick way too many times.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 01-08 22:49

The numbers don't add up. This is outrageous. 108M? I think there's some exaggeration in the 108M. Debt financing is being forcibly counted as equity.

View OriginalReply0