Ethereum's scalability approach may need to change. Vitalik's recent discussion has sparked quite a bit of debate in the community—rather than solely pursuing faster block times, the focus should be on expanding data bandwidth. Simply put, it's no longer about speed for its own sake, but about enabling each block to carry more data.



The logic behind this shift is quite straightforward. The current bottleneck in Ethereum isn't the block production rate but data capacity. Imagine a subway during rush hour—it's not that trains run too infrequently, but that the cars can't hold that many people. Bandwidth expansion is doing the same—using sharding technology and data availability layers, among other solutions, to allow each transaction to process more data, naturally increasing overall throughput.

Of course, this path isn't easy. Sharding, DA layers, and similar solutions are technically challenging, and progress can easily stall. Plus, the market tends to hype things up first and then cool down—before seeing impressive TPS numbers, price volatility can be quite intense.

From an ecosystem perspective, Layer 2 solutions like Arbitrum and Optimism might usher in new opportunities. If this scalability route is successfully implemented, it will be a positive development for the entire Layer 2 ecosystem. In the short term, it may boost market sentiment, but long-term gains depend on the technology truly delivering.
ETH0,84%
ARB-1,38%
OP-0,59%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenAlchemistvip
· 9h ago
da layer arbitrage surface just got way more interesting tbh... if vitalik's actually pivoting from tps theater to actual bandwidth optimization, the inefficiency vectors on l2s are about to shift hard. arb & op positioning themselves better already ngl
Reply0
MrRightClickvip
· 16h ago
The subway analogy is brilliant; finally, someone has explained it clearly. Instead of competing over TPS, it's better to focus on solid bandwidth. Vitalik's approach is still reliable.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckboxvip
· 01-08 23:50
This shift in thinking is actually more practical, not just to make the TPS numbers look good.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBouncervip
· 01-08 23:47
Hmm... That's right, but when will Vitalik's theory actually be implemented? It feels like we might have to wait another few years.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseurvip
· 01-08 23:47
It's the same theory again... Basically, it's just that Ethereum hasn't figured out what to do yet.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardianvip
· 01-08 23:46
Vitalik has really had a breakthrough this time. Instead of competing on TPS, it's better to compete on data volume. In other words, it's about changing the approach to maximize gains. It's obvious at a glance that in the short term, prices will either go up or down. Real implementation might still be a long way off. After so many years of sharding technology, it still feels more difficult than mining gold. The technical debt keeps piling up.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationOraclevip
· 01-08 23:45
This change in thinking is quite interesting, but to be honest, it still depends on whether the technology can keep up. By the time sharding is truly implemented, the hype will have cooled down.
View OriginalReply0
MemeTokenGeniusvip
· 01-08 23:35
Oh, changing the approach again? Vitalik's mind really, I praise the logic of bandwidth > speed L2s are about to take off, right?
View OriginalReply0
ServantOfSatoshivip
· 01-08 23:25
Once again, the same old story, V God has changed his tune.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)