2026-01-08 23:32:29

WORM's privacy solution is worth paying attention to in the Ethereum ecosystem. It doesn't treat "privacy" as a marketing gimmick, but instead follows a more practical technical approach. The core logic is quite clear: destroy ETH to an unusable address, then re-mint an equal value on a new wallet through zero-knowledge proofs. This mechanism cleverly cuts off the traceability of fund flows, making on-chain privacy no longer just a concept. Compared to other privacy primitives, WORM's design is relatively restrained but effective.

ETH-0,07%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SmartMoneyWallet

· 18h ago

The operation of the burn address depends on how many big players are truly willing to use it in the future. Distribution of chips is the real key.

View OriginalReply0

MemeEchoer

· 20h ago

The logic of burn and minting indeed looks clean and straightforward, much more reliable than those projects that keep yapping about privacy all day long.

View OriginalReply0

SeasonedInvestor

· 01-09 09:49

The logic of burn and re-mint is indeed hardcore, much more reliable than projects that shout about privacy every day.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterLucky

· 01-09 00:02

Burning and re-minting, sounds like playing with fire... Can it truly completely cut off tracking, or does it just increase the difficulty of scrutiny?

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMigrant

· 01-09 00:01

The burn address is re-minted with ZK, this approach indeed bypasses on-chain tracking and is much more reliable than those overly hyped privacy coins.

View OriginalReply0

FudVaccinator

· 01-09 00:01

The burn-and-mint gameplay... is indeed much more reliable than those projects that shout about privacy every day. Zero-knowledge proofs serve as an endorsement, and cutting off tracking scores points.

View OriginalReply0

ruggedSoBadLMAO

· 01-09 00:00

I've seen the "burn and mint" scheme too many times, but the key is whether it can really work in practice.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-beba108d

· 01-08 23:53

Hmm... The routine of burning and re-minting actually feels a bit risky, with quite a few potential pitfalls.

View OriginalReply0

PumpAnalyst

· 01-08 23:40

This wave of WORM does have some substance, but to be honest, I've seen the burn and rebuild tactic quite a few times. The key is whether anyone will actually use it moving forward—don't let it become just a pure concept hype again.

View OriginalReply0