Sei is doing something that most public blockchains haven't taken seriously.
Recently, we analyzed the data performance of the Sei ecosystem, and one phenomenon stands out as particularly interesting: while other public chains are still competing over TPS numbers and underlying technological innovations, Sei is focusing on a more pragmatic aspect—the ecosystem distribution.
What is distribution? Simply put, regardless of how beautiful the product is, how do users access it? How is funding introduced? Where does the traffic come from? These seemingly basic questions are actually the shortcomings of many public chains.
Sei's approach is: instead of getting entangled in surpassing each other on technical metrics, it's better to first establish smooth circulation channels for ecosystem applications. This means better development tools, lower entry barriers, and more flexible incentive mechanisms—making it easier for project teams and users to connect.
From this perspective, Sei isn't chasing other public chains; it's redefining the dimensions of competition for public chains. While everyone else is competing on performance, Sei is competing on ecosystem operation efficiency.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BridgeTrustFund
· 9h ago
To be honest, Sei's recent approach has really awakened everyone; ecosystem distribution is the real bottleneck.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHermit
· 01-10 20:18
The selling point is good, but I don't know if it can really be implemented. There are too many followers.
View OriginalReply0
LightningClicker
· 01-09 09:56
Woke up, finally some public chains are starting to understand this matter
Honestly, this is the right path, much more interesting than TPS numbers
It turns out that competing over technical indicators is the real internal friction
Sei's move is indeed different from others
Building a good ecosystem is indeed better than rushing for speed
This logic is very clear, not all public chains have thought of it
It feels like they've grasped the key point
No wonder Sei has been gaining popularity recently
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemist
· 01-09 09:54
That's right, the competition can go on forever, but in the end, there are still no users. Sei's move is indeed clever.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureDenied
· 01-09 09:53
To be honest, I buy into this logic. Ecosystem operation is indeed an underestimated competitive advantage.
View OriginalReply0
SadMoneyMeow
· 01-09 09:52
This idea is brilliant. Finally, a public chain has figured it out. What's the use of just comparing TPS? Without a thriving ecosystem, it's still a dead end.
Sei is doing something that most public blockchains haven't taken seriously.
Recently, we analyzed the data performance of the Sei ecosystem, and one phenomenon stands out as particularly interesting: while other public chains are still competing over TPS numbers and underlying technological innovations, Sei is focusing on a more pragmatic aspect—the ecosystem distribution.
What is distribution? Simply put, regardless of how beautiful the product is, how do users access it? How is funding introduced? Where does the traffic come from? These seemingly basic questions are actually the shortcomings of many public chains.
Sei's approach is: instead of getting entangled in surpassing each other on technical metrics, it's better to first establish smooth circulation channels for ecosystem applications. This means better development tools, lower entry barriers, and more flexible incentive mechanisms—making it easier for project teams and users to connect.
From this perspective, Sei isn't chasing other public chains; it's redefining the dimensions of competition for public chains. While everyone else is competing on performance, Sei is competing on ecosystem operation efficiency.