2026-01-09 09:30:04

The competition in the privacy finance sector is becoming increasingly fierce, and DUSK has established a foothold with its solid technological foundation. When it comes to its core competitiveness, one must mention ZK-SNARKs zero-knowledge proof technology — sensitive information such as transaction addresses and amounts can be completely anonymous while ensuring that transactions are verifiable, thoroughly breaking the limitations of traditional public chains where "all data is transparent."

Even more impressive, DUSK has achieved EVM compatibility, which means DeFi projects and NFT platforms within the Ethereum ecosystem can migrate seamlessly without changing their existing functions, while also gaining privacy protection capabilities. Coupled with the PoS consensus mechanism, the threshold for node participation is significantly lowered, transaction confirmation speeds can reach seconds, achieving both security and performance.

From an application perspective, privacy DEXs, privacy NFT platforms, and others have already been implemented on DUSK, meeting the diverse privacy needs from individual users to institutions. As the crypto market's emphasis on privacy continues to grow, DUSK's technological value in this sector still has considerable room for release.

DUSK-2,6%

ETH-0,46%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseHobo

· 01-10 09:49

ZK-SNARKs sound awesome, but can they really prevent on-chain detectives? --- EVM compatibility is a killer feature; migrating Ethereum projects with one click is a game-changer. --- Privacy DEX is already up and running? Keep an eye on this wave, or you'll regret missing out. --- Seconds-level confirmation plus privacy shield—this combo is pretty powerful. --- It sounds good to call it privacy, but honestly, maybe it's just to hide something, hmmm... --- Low node threshold is something I like; it's definitely better than those public chains that require huge investments. --- Institutional-grade privacy demands? Sounds like this might not be for retail investors. --- Is DUSK really gaining a foothold, or is it just another project hyped up too much? --- Zero-knowledge proofs combined with EVM—this tech combo isn't something I've seen too often. --- With the privacy race so intense, how can DUSK break through?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterZhang

· 01-09 10:00

Another privacy chain to harvest profits? EVM compatibility is a well-known trick, and how many can truly be implemented... However, ZK technology does have some real potential; it just depends on how long it can last.

View OriginalReply0

DataChief

· 01-09 09:59

ZK-SNARKs are indeed impressive, but can privacy chains really become popular? --- EVM compatibility is an old but useful trick; the key still depends on whether the ecosystem can be built up. --- Instant confirmation sounds good, but what is the actual TPS it can handle? --- Has the privacy DEX already been implemented? Why does it feel like there's not much buzz? --- Another player in the privacy track; with such fierce competition, can it really stand out? --- Anonymous transactions sound great, but what about regulation? That's the real issue. --- Low PoS thresholds are a good thing, but will it become just a playground for whales again? --- Having solid underlying technology is one thing; whether users are willing to use it is another. --- EVM compatibility is no longer innovative; now everyone is compatible. --- With so many projects in the privacy finance track, why will DUSK win? It depends on the subsequent ecosystem development.

View OriginalReply0

IntrovertMetaverse

· 01-09 09:57

Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed technically solid, but can privacy coins really become popular? I'm a bit skeptical. EVM compatibility is good, but migrating ecosystems is no easy task... Funds are the real king. Instant confirmation sounds great, but how does it perform in practice? We need to see. What does regulation think about privacy? I'm a bit worried about the risks. No matter how advanced the technology is, it needs practical use cases to support it; otherwise, it's just hype. Can Dusk seize this opportunity? It depends on whether the market is willing to buy in. Zero-knowledge proofs are really cool, but I wonder if ordinary users will actually use them. To put it simply, it's still the same old problem: no matter how fast the chain, someone has to adopt it. It feels like the privacy track is gaining popularity, but there are quite a few competitors too. I believe in instant transactions, but can the transaction volume be maintained once it grows? That's the key.

View OriginalReply0

NftDeepBreather

· 01-09 09:56

ZK-SNARKs technology is indeed excellent, but with the privacy track so competitive, whether DUSK can stand out still depends on ecosystem development. EVM compatibility is a clever move, directly reducing migration costs, but it remains to be seen if there will be a truly killer app in the future. Seconds-level confirmation sounds great, but the actual adoption rate is uncertain. Privacy needs are indeed heating up, but regulatory hurdles always pose challenges. How does DUSK balance this? Speaking of zero-knowledge proofs, Monero and Zcash have both tried, so why shouldn't DUSK follow the same path? No matter how advanced the underlying technology is, without liquidity and users, it's just scrap. That’s the real test. It sounds good, but let's talk when it’s truly implemented. Right now, many concept stocks are hyped up like this.

View OriginalReply0