Here's an interesting historical pattern nobody talks about enough: almost every major technological breakthrough—from the steam engine to electricity to automation—sparked the same panic. People worried machines would destroy jobs and leave society with masses of idle workers.
Yet two centuries later, economies adapted. New industries emerged. The labor market shifted, sure, but it didn't collapse into the dystopia everyone predicted.
So why do we keep repeating this cycle? Maybe because each generation genuinely can't imagine what comes next. The transformation feels too fast, too disruptive. But history suggests the answer isn't "stop innovation"—it's "we're probably overthinking the timeline."
Make what you will of it.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainTherapist
· 01-09 17:12
History has never truly collapsed so many times before, and this time probably won't be either... It's just that each generation has to scare itself once.
View OriginalReply0
LightningClicker
· 01-09 10:43
Honestly, I'm tired of this logic already, always bringing up history to make a point... But on the other hand, it seems like no one really ends up jobless after losing work due to the steam engine?
View OriginalReply0
HodlTheDoor
· 01-09 10:42
It's the same old story again, claiming that history will prove everything every time. The question is, is it really the same this time?
View OriginalReply0
StopLossMaster
· 01-09 10:42
Honestly, I've heard this argument many times... Every time they say history will prove everything, but right now, the unemployment rate is soaring.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiCaffeinator
· 01-09 10:38
It's the same old story again, history may repeat itself but it won't repeat exactly...
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 01-09 10:30
Oh no, it's the same old rhetoric, the cycle of history. It sounds reasonable, but when you're actually unemployed, it's a different story.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 01-09 10:13
Basically, humans tend to worry about the worst, and every technological innovation has to scare themselves once.
Here's an interesting historical pattern nobody talks about enough: almost every major technological breakthrough—from the steam engine to electricity to automation—sparked the same panic. People worried machines would destroy jobs and leave society with masses of idle workers.
Yet two centuries later, economies adapted. New industries emerged. The labor market shifted, sure, but it didn't collapse into the dystopia everyone predicted.
So why do we keep repeating this cycle? Maybe because each generation genuinely can't imagine what comes next. The transformation feels too fast, too disruptive. But history suggests the answer isn't "stop innovation"—it's "we're probably overthinking the timeline."
Make what you will of it.