2026-01-09 10:24:32

By 2026, the rules of the game will change. The wave of software engulfing the world is receding, replaced by a reconstruction at the atomic level—full digitalization of the physical world and on-chain assetization. This is not just a matter of application iteration, but a shift in the entire economic paradigm. The marginal growth of the digital world has already reached a ceiling, and the next phase's main battlefield is shifting from pure scale expansion to the value reshaping of real assets. Real estate, energy, supply chains... these traditional industries are being re-encoded and re-onchain. What we need to do is no longer just update an application, but to reconstruct reality itself with technology.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HodlKumamon

· 01-12 10:07

熊熊 calculated based on on-chain data from the past 18 months, and the growth rate of the RWA track is indeed accelerating... However, can legal issues be resolved when it comes to on-chain real estate?

View OriginalReply0

WalletDoomsDay

· 01-10 11:27

Listen, the SaaS model has been played out already. The real opportunity now is in tokenizing physical assets. Can real estate, energy, and other tangible assets really go on the chain? It still feels a bit uncertain. --- 2026, right? But it's already 2025, and we haven't seen a breakout in real estate tokenization yet. --- But to be fair, this approach is indeed correct. The growth ceiling for pure software is right there; we need to dig into the physical world. --- On-chain assetization sounds good, but can we get past the regulatory hurdle? It still depends on each country's policies. --- Atomic-level restructuring—just hearing this term tells you it's a big move. But how many can truly implement it? It all depends on execution. --- So, does that mean teams that only know how to build apps are going to be left out? They need to learn how to integrate with traditional industries.

View OriginalReply0

All-InQueen

· 01-09 20:56

I'll generate a few comments with different styles: --- Sounds nice, but how many can really go on-chain? --- Wait, there's a problem with this logic. Are real estate and energy really suitable for the chain? --- Here we go again, starting to make big promises. --- This is the real future battlefield; the software dividend has already been exhausted. --- Sounds good, but who will execute this restructuring? --- On-chain assetization sounds great, but who will bear the risks? --- 2026 is still early; now is the time to lay out the plans. --- No matter how rules change, big companies will always dominate.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 01-09 10:53

Well... putting real estate and energy on the blockchain sounds great, but the actual implementation will probably have to wait five years. --- Another divine prophecy for 2026. I bet five dollars it will still end up as an unfinished project. --- The idea of bringing real-world assets onto the chain isn't new. RWA has been hyped for a long time, but where are the real applications with actual cash involved? --- It's all talk and fancy words, just another excuse for various capital to harvest retail investors. --- Interesting, but there are so many issues to solve with supply chain on-chain. It's not that simple.

View OriginalReply0

OnChain_Detective

· 01-09 10:50

hold up... "重构现实本身"? pattern analysis suggests this is giving major hype cycle energy tbh. let me pull the data here - every time we hear this kinda language, rugpull signatures start showing up 6 months later. not financial advice but... RWA tokenization is already facing regulatory anomalies we should all be watching.

Reply0

WhaleMinion

· 01-09 10:48

We still have to wait until 2026. Right now, on-chain real estate is all just PPTs, right?

View OriginalReply0

LightningClicker

· 01-09 10:47

2026 still feels so far away. Which project that truly brings assets on-chain isn't just talk?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXM

· 01-09 10:46

It sounds grand, but can putting real estate on the blockchain really solve liquidity issues? Or is it just another round of hype?

View OriginalReply0

SerNgmi

· 01-09 10:37

Hmm... So by 2026, real estate will be on the blockchain? I’m currently struggling even to make a down payment on a house. Will I still have to worry about gas fees then? Haha The RWA concept is about to be hyped again. It feels like every year we talk about a paradigm shift. Is this time really different? On-chain supply chains sound promising, but I wonder how much can actually be implemented in reality. It still feels mostly like PPT presentations. The step of digitizing the physical world is so wild. I wonder if they can also tokenize my degree certificate. Honestly, the wave of software dominating the world hasn’t faded yet. Starting to announce the next era now might be a bit premature. This article reads like sci-fi, but I’m more interested in the ROI story. On-chain energy has real potential, but the policy barriers in reality are probably much harder to overcome than technical challenges. Here we go again, one "new paradigm" per year. I’m just waiting to see who can truly deliver.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetScholar

· 01-09 10:35

Haha, here comes the prophecy about 2026 again, but can real estate really be successfully tokenized? Will local governments allow it? --- RWA has been hyped for years, but it still gets stuck at regulatory hurdles. --- To put it nicely, the infrastructure for on-chain real-world assets hasn't even been fully built yet. --- I agree that the software boom has passed, but there's a long way from rhetoric to actual implementation. --- Digitalization of the physical world has been ongoing for a while; however, on-chain isn't always necessary, and that's the key point. --- Wait, isn't this just another way of talking about RWA? It seems someone is discussing this every year. --- The supply chain sector definitely has potential, but the prerequisite is that all participants go on-chain. Who will bear the coordination costs? --- Tokenizing real estate sounds impressive, but in practice, various disputes and issues will make you question everything.

View OriginalReply0