Many traders die in one place — not being able to distinguish where the losses come from.
Surviving in the crypto trading world isn’t about how much you earn, but whether you can clearly identify two completely different types of losses.
**The first is called "system-internal loss."** Imagine using GPS navigation while driving, but still crashing into a construction zone. The specific scenario is: you confirm a trend reversal on a certain timeframe, enter on a pullback or breakout according to your strategy, but the market falls deeper than you predicted, or a false breakout is followed by a sharp reversal, triggering your stop-loss. This isn’t a mistake in judgment or operation. On the contrary, it’s your system functioning normally, collecting tuition fees for every "attempt to catch a trend." This loss is like an investment cost — necessary.
**The second is "external system loss."** Emotional manipulation, arbitrarily changing rules, stubbornly adding to positions, not executing stop-losses — this is the real abyss. Many people’s tragedies start here.
The problem is, most traders mistake the first type for the second. Once their planned stop-loss is triggered, they begin to doubt themselves, then start to modify their originally decent strategy, and eventually the system completely collapses.
**Regarding short-term gains and losses, there’s a cruel mathematical truth:** any short-term fluctuation is full of luck. You might make money several times in a row on the edge of a cliff, or be repeatedly harvested by normal system stop-losses. If you start to deny yourself after a few consecutive losses, or begin to adjust your strategy, you’re doomed. The long-term probability law simply won’t wait for you to figure out the short-term noise.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NftMetaversePainter
· 01-12 07:17
actually, the algorithmic distinction between systematic drawdown and emotional hemorrhaging is precisely where most traders' generative wealth-building narratives collapse... the hash value of your strategy's integrity gets corrupted the moment you conflate noise with signal degradation
Reply0
LiquidationTherapist
· 01-11 22:16
Changing the strategy after just one stop-loss hit is indeed suicidal; it's even more terrifying than losing money itself.
View OriginalReply0
Hash_Bandit
· 01-09 15:48
tbh this hits different when you've actually watched your hashrate drop on a failed mining rig... the "system vs noise" thing? that's literally difficulty adjustment cycles in disguise. most people don't have the stomach to ride it out
Reply0
LiquidityHunter
· 01-09 10:54
I saw this article at 3 a.m., and the data points are really eye-opening. The distinction between losses inside the system versus external losses essentially boils down to the difference between liquidity depth testing and emotional trading... Most people simply can't tell the difference.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 01-09 10:44
That really hits home... I got caught on the self-denial after the stop-loss was triggered. How many times did I revise my strategy?
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 01-09 10:41
Damn, this is the reason why I keep wanting to add positions after being stopped out... Turns out I've been in a self-denial system all along.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDoomsDay
· 01-09 10:30
The most heartbreaking statement is "Most traders mistake the first type for the second," which perfectly describes me last year...
Many traders die in one place — not being able to distinguish where the losses come from.
Surviving in the crypto trading world isn’t about how much you earn, but whether you can clearly identify two completely different types of losses.
**The first is called "system-internal loss."** Imagine using GPS navigation while driving, but still crashing into a construction zone. The specific scenario is: you confirm a trend reversal on a certain timeframe, enter on a pullback or breakout according to your strategy, but the market falls deeper than you predicted, or a false breakout is followed by a sharp reversal, triggering your stop-loss. This isn’t a mistake in judgment or operation. On the contrary, it’s your system functioning normally, collecting tuition fees for every "attempt to catch a trend." This loss is like an investment cost — necessary.
**The second is "external system loss."** Emotional manipulation, arbitrarily changing rules, stubbornly adding to positions, not executing stop-losses — this is the real abyss. Many people’s tragedies start here.
The problem is, most traders mistake the first type for the second. Once their planned stop-loss is triggered, they begin to doubt themselves, then start to modify their originally decent strategy, and eventually the system completely collapses.
**Regarding short-term gains and losses, there’s a cruel mathematical truth:** any short-term fluctuation is full of luck. You might make money several times in a row on the edge of a cliff, or be repeatedly harvested by normal system stop-losses. If you start to deny yourself after a few consecutive losses, or begin to adjust your strategy, you’re doomed. The long-term probability law simply won’t wait for you to figure out the short-term noise.