2026-01-09 10:27:12

Recently, the Walrus Protocol project is indeed quite interesting, with its technical aspects and token design worth exploring.

From a technical perspective, the RedStuff encoding directly reduces storage costs. This off-chain storage combined with on-chain indexing architecture is truly innovative. It ensures data security, significantly cuts gas fees, and with asynchronous challenge proofs, node operation and maintenance costs can also be greatly reduced. These are not empty words; for the storage track, this is indeed a disruptive innovation.

The tokenomics also show thoughtful design. 60% of the tokens are allocated to the community, with a very low staking threshold. This design is very friendly to participants. More importantly, the deflationary mechanism—transaction fees and node penalties are all burned, so the circulating supply will only decrease over time. This is indeed attractive to long-term token holders.

The current popularity is also good, with technical teams providing in-depth project analysis and many people engaging in community interactions. Whether focusing on the technical aspects or the token scarcity, this project is worth paying more attention to. As competition in the Web3 storage track intensifies, Walrus will need to focus on ecosystem development and practical application implementation to stand out.

WAL0,53%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

bridge_anxiety

· 01-12 02:33

Sounds good, but the real question is whether it can survive. --- RedStuff's coding is indeed cool, but I don't know if the nodes will run away. --- 60% community allocation? I've seen this approach too many times. The key is whether someone will use it. --- The deflationary mechanism sounds great, but will it turn out to be a slaughter again in reality? --- There are many projects in the storage track, so why does it have to be Walrus? --- Low staking threshold sounds good, but I always feel it's just the prelude to a rug pull. --- I haven't heard of asynchronous challenge proof before. Can someone explain the principle? --- Ecological implementation is the real key. No matter how aggressively it's promoted now, it won't help.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 01-10 13:13

Wow, the storage track is really coming up with new tricks I heard the deflation mechanism is quite powerful, with all fees burned? That’s a clever approach The low staking threshold makes me want to take a closer look, and the community allocation is indeed tempting Just worried it might be all show on paper; real-world application is the true test

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeWhisperer

· 01-09 10:57

Sounds good, but real-world implementation is the hard part. RedStuff encoding saves Gas, but how much it can actually save on the mainnet depends on real data. Low staking thresholds are a good thing, but I'm worried it might become just another scam to fleece users. Storage is a competitive field, so what makes Walrus stand out? That's the key. A beautiful technical white paper doesn't necessarily mean the product will perform well. Let's wait and see. Token burning and deflation sound great, but liquidity in the early stages is a concern. Ecological development is a hundred times more important than just hype. I'm still observing, but it's definitely worth following up.

View OriginalReply0

Hash_Bandit

· 01-09 10:51

ngl the redstuff encoding thing sounds like watching difficulty adjust on a new asic era... finally someone's actually thinking about hardware efficiency in storage

Reply0

StakeHouseDirector

· 01-09 10:49

It sounds like RedStuff's coding is indeed impressive, but will it be a different story when actually used? The storage track is now crowded with people, whether Walrus can succeed depends entirely on the strength of ecosystem development. The deflationary mechanism sounds great, but the key is whether someone will keep buying in. Low staking thresholds are a good thing, but I'm worried it might just become another air project scheme. So that 60% community allocation, isn't it ultimately flowing to big players and market makers?

View OriginalReply0

ParallelChainMaxi

· 01-09 10:35

Alright, Walrus indeed has a sizable project, but I'm just worried it might turn into the next PPP story. RedStuff's approach is really impressive, but whether it can be implemented depends on who adopts it first. The deflationary design is quite clever, but a 60% community allocation... such a ratio has become a bit tiresome. High popularity now doesn't mean it will stay hot in half a year; the storage sector is very competitive. A low staking threshold might actually be a bit risky? If anyone can participate, it also means the risks can't be diversified.

View OriginalReply0

ChainPoet

· 01-09 10:32

Wait, really? Is this RedStuff encoding that awesome? That sounds a bit exaggerated. It feels like storytelling season again; practical implementation is the key. A 60% community allocation is indeed good, but who still believes in deflationary mechanisms these days? The storage track is so competitive, how can Walrus stand out? Let’s see. This guy writes quite thoroughly, but the subsequent ecosystem is a big issue; the key is that someone actually uses it. I'm a bit tempted, but I need to wait and see the project's sincerity. The technical highlights are good, but I'm worried it’s just another PPT fundraising.

View OriginalReply0