Development environments tell lies. When you build on your local machine with Gigabit fiber, network requests complete in 5ms. The interface responds instantly. You hit “Submit,” the modal closes, and the feature ships. Problem solved. ✅
Meanwhile, a user on 4G in an underground station hits the same button. The API call takes 2 seconds. Your app doesn’t handle it.
The gap between localhost and the real world isn’t a minor inconvenience—it’s where critical failures hide.
What breaks under latency:
🖱️ Duplicate Submission: User clicks twice because nothing appeared to happen, charging their card twice
🔄 Frozen States: Loading indicators get stuck when packets drop
🏎️ Race Conditions: Responses arrive out of order, corrupting user input
Your app seems bulletproof because you’ve been testing in a false reality.
Why sleep() Doesn’t Cut It
Many test suites attempt to simulate slowness like this:
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Why Network Throttling Test Results Expose Your App's Hidden Bugs
The Localhost Testing Trap
Development environments tell lies. When you build on your local machine with Gigabit fiber, network requests complete in 5ms. The interface responds instantly. You hit “Submit,” the modal closes, and the feature ships. Problem solved. ✅
Meanwhile, a user on 4G in an underground station hits the same button. The API call takes 2 seconds. Your app doesn’t handle it.
The gap between localhost and the real world isn’t a minor inconvenience—it’s where critical failures hide.
What breaks under latency:
Your app seems bulletproof because you’ve been testing in a false reality.
Why sleep() Doesn’t Cut It
Many test suites attempt to simulate slowness like this: