2026-01-09 11:26:27

The old problems in academia are back—data tampering, "unexpected" loss of results—these tricks are played out year after year. To fundamentally solve this trust crisis, decentralized scientific platforms are starting to redo everything with blockchain technology.

Some teams are now using Walrus to store original manuscripts and experimental data. What's the reasoning behind this choice? The key lies in two features: immutability and censorship resistance. Once data is sharded and stored on the chain, creating object records, no publisher, university, or individual can delete or modify them alone. Even if some network nodes go offline, the remaining nodes can still reconstruct the complete data.

Even more impressively, they link the paper's Blob ID with the citation system on Sui, effectively establishing a permanent, traceable knowledge graph. If someone tries to cheat academically? It might go unnoticed in centralized databases, but on the chain—hash commitments immediately expose you. This is why Walrus is like a "permanent anchor" for human knowledge; this trust foundation is something traditional databases simply cannot provide.

From a technical perspective, this is a truly meaningful application of blockchain storage—not for hype, but to address real-world integrity issues.

SUI2,53%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DYORMaster

· 01-12 11:25

Finally, someone is using blockchain in the right way, not just for trading cryptocurrencies but genuinely solving problems. This is what Web3 is supposed to do.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoDouble-O-Seven

· 01-12 05:05

Finally, someone has figured out academic misconduct, and on-chain provenance directly cuts off the tricks of those "lost data" schemes.

View OriginalReply0

ZenChainWalker

· 01-11 09:50

Wow, this is what blockchain should be doing, not just speculating on coins. Finally, someone has exposed that academic nonsense—once the data is on the chain, no one can alter it. Nice. Walrus sounds really reliable; it's much better than traditional databases with trust relationships. Academic dishonesty on the chain is like self-sabotage; hash commitments are foolproof. This is what true decentralized applications look like; anything else is basically nonsense.

View OriginalReply0

BlockBargainHunter

· 01-09 11:56

Hash commitments directly expose academic fraud, this is what blockchain should do --- Walrus's approach is truly excellent; once the data is on the chain, it becomes irrefutable evidence, making denial difficult --- Finally, someone is using blockchain correctly, not for speculation but to solve trust crises --- The concept of permanent anchoring is amazing; original research data that can never be deleted—academic dishonesty's end is near --- Sharding storage + node redundancy, this is what decentralization should look like; traditional academic circles should be trembling --- Sui ecosystem is launching again, turning paper provenance into a knowledge graph, the gameplay is becoming more and more elaborate --- The immutability feature alone is enough to overthrow the entire academic publishing system; centralized databases should be panicking --- On-chain academic integrity is a track with real imagination, much more interesting than most Web3 projects

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Arbitrageur

· 01-09 11:53

ngl walrus + sui reference binding actually slaps harder than i expected... lemme run the numbers real quick on immutability costs vs traditional db infrastructure 🤔

Reply0

ser_we_are_ngmi

· 01-09 11:39

Wow, this is what blockchain should be doing, not just speculating on coins. Academic fraud finally has a nemesis.

View OriginalReply0

gaslight_gasfeez

· 01-09 11:38

Haha, finally someone is using blockchain to tackle the vicious cycle of academic fraud. It should have been done this way long ago.

View OriginalReply0

SellTheBounce

· 01-09 11:27

Uh, sounds good, but I have to say—blockchain solving academic integrity? That's a bit too optimistic. Who will cover the cost of putting data on the chain?

View OriginalReply0