The $ShieldsAI narrative raises an interesting question: not everyone's cut out for crypto. The barriers aren't just technical—they're philosophical. When you're dealing with decentralized systems and self-custody, accountability shifts entirely to the user. That's liberating for those who get it, but honestly? A lot of people aren't ready for that responsibility.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DAOdreamer
· 01-09 11:54
To be honest, self-custody is just a sieve that instantly separates the newbies from the players. Most people don't want to bear the costs that come with this freedom; they still prefer the fallback feeling of centralized systems.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfit
· 01-09 11:53
Basically, it's only when you lose your wallet that you realize what self-redemption truly means, haha.
View OriginalReply0
Fren_Not_Food
· 01-09 11:47
ngl that's why most people are still lying on centralized exchanges... Self-custody really isn't something everyone can handle.
View OriginalReply0
BlindBoxVictim
· 01-09 11:44
That hits pretty close to home... The right to self-custody is indeed not something everyone can handle.
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegen
· 01-09 11:29
You're not wrong; the self-management approach really isn't something everyone can accept. Most people still want a parent to tell them what to do; with crypto, you have to take the blame yourself.
The $ShieldsAI narrative raises an interesting question: not everyone's cut out for crypto. The barriers aren't just technical—they're philosophical. When you're dealing with decentralized systems and self-custody, accountability shifts entirely to the user. That's liberating for those who get it, but honestly? A lot of people aren't ready for that responsibility.