2026-01-09 11:30:31

Recently, I have been studying Twitter's traffic distribution logic and conducted several rounds of comparison tests.

The previous plan was able to accumulate 5 million visits in 3 days, but there were voices in the comment section saying that the efficiency was not high enough and the conversion benefits were average.

Yesterday, I re-examined Twitter's recommendation mechanism and traffic pool system, and took a different approach—abandoning reliance on replies and directly creating original posts.

The results are quite interesting. A single post can also achieve traffic levels of 1 million.

This shows that there is still a lot of room for strategic adjustment. I will continue testing for a few more days, summarize the complete data and patterns, and share them with everyone. It seems it's not that complicated after all.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HashRateHustler

· 6h ago

Alright, original posts directly reach 1m, this way of thinking really opened up Really didn't expect that the reply would be a traffic funnel, learned something Keep producing data, I'm waiting for your complete summary Wait, is this 1m unique or impression? Damn, conversion rate is the key, 5m without revenue is pointless I need to ponder this logic, is Twitter's algorithm really that straightforward? No, your adjustment range is a bit too large... Can it really be stably reproduced? Thumbs up, just waiting for your detailed review Are original posts really this powerful? Then I was completely doing it wrong before The logic of traffic pools is finally systematically summarized by someone

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiNotNakamoto

· 01-11 08:25

Original post surpasses one million views? This guy seems to have figured out the trick. Is Twitter's recommendation algorithm really played like this?

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxOpener

· 01-09 11:58

Wow, original content directly gets 1 million views, the gap is quite big.

View OriginalReply0

ChainChef

· 01-09 11:51

ngl the real alpha was switching from reply farming to og posts... that's like realizing you've been making stock from bones when you could just sear the meat directly lol

Reply0

MoneyBurner

· 01-09 11:48

Wow, which track does this data correspond to? I immediately recognize the 1 million per item as an insider, but the conversion rate is the real test.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPrince

· 01-09 11:43

Original posts really get replies, I've also noticed that. The key is to find that traffic hotspot.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainSleuth

· 01-09 11:40

Original posts are truly awesome. Trading 5m for 1m sounds like a loss, but the conversion rate has actually improved. That's why some people can't keep up and give up on studying... algorithms are always changing. When the data is out, remember to share it in the group. I'm in a hurry.

View OriginalReply0

APY追逐者

· 01-09 11:33

Wait, can an original post directly get 1m traffic? That logic is interesting. --- 5m visits conversion rate is average, indicating a problem with fan quality or content positioning. --- Why is the efficiency of original posts vs replies so different? I feel like it's the other way around. --- You're testing data again and want to share, hurry up and draw conclusions, bro, don't keep us in suspense. --- Is the 1m figure for unique users or just page views? There's a big difference between the two. --- Twitter's algorithm adjustments are so frequent, your data will probably need to be retested in a couple of months. --- It's hard to hold on; I followed the trend to create original content, but still got zero engagement. --- A single post with 1m views, but how about the conversion? That's the real key.

View OriginalReply0