Tonight, I came across the entire fundraising process of MetaDAO and Ranger Finance. I have to say that the overall project operation approach truly breaks conventional understanding. From fundraising design, community participation to token distribution mechanisms, each step is carefully planned, and the professionalism and innovation displayed are truly impressive. The differentiated strategies of these two projects in fundraising also provide many new ideas for the industry. There are still many aspects worth deep observation in Web3 fundraising.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ruggedNotShrugged
· 23h ago
Wait, is the token allocation at MetaDAO really that transparent? It feels a bit too perfect.
View OriginalReply0
BottomMisser
· 01-10 19:56
Fundraising design is really particular, but token allocation still needs to be closely monitored.
MetaDAO's differentiated approach is interesting, but whether the community enthusiasm can be maintained is a question.
Compared to these two projects, the fundraising logic gap is indeed quite large.
Ranger's token mechanism is quite detailed, but how far it can go still depends on subsequent execution.
Fundraising professionalism has improved, but truly implementable projects are still rare.
It feels like the Web3 fundraising strategies need to be refreshed again.
MetaDAO's approach is indeed innovative, but hopefully it won't become the next harvesting machine.
Comparing these two, the imagination space for fundraising strategies is still quite large.
View OriginalReply0
hodl_therapist
· 01-10 19:56
MetaDAO's token distribution logic is truly excellent, far surpassing those projects that just cut leeks.
View OriginalReply0
SellTheBounce
· 01-10 19:55
Meticulous planning? I think this is just a well-packaged pump-and-dump scheme. The more complex the financing process, the easier retail investors are to be drawn in. History has shown me that behind every innovative financing, there's a new way to cut leeks.
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggee
· 01-10 19:47
Alright, this financing logic does have some substance, but the token distribution needs to be clearly understood.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFan
· 01-10 19:46
MetaDAO's funding framework is indeed impressive; I've never seen such a detailed token allocation before.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 01-10 19:39
Well... to be honest, the token allocation seems quite detailed, but how many of them can actually be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
BrokeBeans
· 01-10 19:30
MetaDAO's token distribution is really impressive, and Ranger's approach is also good, but it just feels like something is still missing.
Tonight, I came across the entire fundraising process of MetaDAO and Ranger Finance. I have to say that the overall project operation approach truly breaks conventional understanding. From fundraising design, community participation to token distribution mechanisms, each step is carefully planned, and the professionalism and innovation displayed are truly impressive. The differentiated strategies of these two projects in fundraising also provide many new ideas for the industry. There are still many aspects worth deep observation in Web3 fundraising.