2026-01-10 21:20:39

Honestly, after diving into this, I've made peace with the idea that CT might not make it. The fundamentals just aren't there anymore.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainArchaeologist

· 14h ago

CT is done for, basically. The fundamentals didn't have much to begin with, and it was obvious long ago.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 01-11 21:48

They've woken up. I've already said that CT is done, but no one believed it.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketHustler

· 01-11 20:14

I should have known earlier, this thing should have given up long ago... Once the fundamentals are gone, they're gone, and it's all pointless to keep arguing.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseFOMOguy

· 01-10 21:50

Oh no, I've already figured out this matter with CT; the fundamentals are indeed weak.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 01-10 21:50

Laughing out loud, this wave of "accepting fate" I would call the moment of the big realization for retail investors. Pretend you haven't heard about it until the next bull market.

View OriginalReply0

TeaTimeTrader

· 01-10 21:50

Hmm... the fundamentals have indeed collapsed. CT might really be beyond recovery this time.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 01-10 21:45

Forget it, CT is really not worth deceiving ourselves anymore; the fundamentals have directly collapsed.

View OriginalReply0

Layer3Dreamer

· 01-10 21:42

tbh, theoretically speaking if we map CT's state degradation onto a recursive SNARK framework... the interoperability vector just doesn't compress anymore. it's like watching a cross-rollup bridge lose coherence mid-verification, you know? the zero-knowledge paradigm can't paper over broken fundamentals lol

Reply0

QuorumVoter