2026-01-11 02:27:59

The crypto ecosystem is experiencing a turning point—regulation has shifted from "Should we come" to "How to come."

This is a challenge for most projects, but for some projects that have long built according to compliance principles, it is actually a moment to amplify their advantages.

Think about traditional finance, where privacy and compliance are never enemies. Banks need audit permissions, and clients need privacy protection. How are these coordinated? Through system design.

Blockchain can do the same. Cryptographic tools like zero-knowledge proofs allow transaction data to be verified, audited, and regulated without exposing all the details on-chain. It sounds simple, but implementing it is extremely difficult.

More importantly, application scenarios matter. In the future, if a large number of securities, bonds, funds, and equities are tokenized and on-chain, they are not suitable to run on fully public blockchains. What is needed is precisely this kind of privacy-compliant dedicated infrastructure.

Many people say these projects are "progressing slowly." But slow isn’t necessarily a problem; it depends on what the slowness is for. Fast projects often rush to consume market hype; true infrastructure requires time and patience.

Historical successful cases of financial-grade public chains have proven this—ultimately, the winners are not always the first to start.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkMaster

· 22h ago

It sounds good, but I see that most project teams are still chasing the trend, and very few are actually spending time building compliant infrastructure.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 01-11 02:53

Nice words, but the on-chain data has long exposed the secrets... The addresses claiming "compliance construction" always have unequal fund flows. Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but in practice, they are just that—full of vulnerabilities. Real financial-grade infrastructure? Ha, let's see who can survive the next round.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWhisperer

· 01-11 02:51

Slow work produces fine craftsmanship, and this time someone finally explained it clearly. Where did all those who rushed the fastest go? --- Can compliance and privacy be achieved simultaneously? Sounds great, but I'm afraid it's just another set of empty words. --- Zero-knowledge proofs have been hyped for a while, but truly usable ones still need more time. --- You're right, financial-grade infrastructure has never been won through marketing. --- Thumbs up, the regulatory hurdle will be crossed sooner or later. Instead of avoiding it, better to adapt early. --- The question is, how many projects are really serious about compliance now? Most are still gambling. --- A dedicated chain for privacy compliance sounds like the future, but only two things can be said about who will live to see that day. --- The logic makes sense, but the market isn't buying it. Fast iterations still attract funding. --- Sometimes, being slow is just an excuse for not finding the right direction, and that's important to distinguish. --- The final winner is never the one who starts first. This sounds familiar...

View OriginalReply0

RiddleMaster

· 01-11 02:39

Well said, slow work yields fine craftsmanship... Those impatient projects have long been slapped in the face. Compliance is indeed a watershed; only those who can withstand it are true players. Looking back now, those so-called "rapid iterations" back then were really of no use at all. If the ZK technology really gets developed successfully, the future potential is indeed huge. But to be honest, how many projects are truly focused on building solid infrastructure? Most are just manipulating the market and harvesting profits.

View OriginalReply0

RunWhenCut

· 01-11 02:38

So under this wave of compliance, are those focusing on infrastructure actually about to take off? I've thought about this for a while. How are the fast-moving projects doing now? Once they exit, it's over. Privacy compliance is a huge opportunity, but there are probably only a few teams capable of tackling it. Zero-knowledge proofs and other cryptographic stuff are indeed difficult, so difficult that I’m too lazy to understand them haha. Wait, will all securities tokens really go on-chain after tokenization? That logic is a bit bold. History always favors those with patience, but most of us probably can't wait that long.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleMistaker

· 01-11 02:29

Wait, can zero-knowledge proofs really solve the contradiction between privacy and compliance? It still feels idealized. Transferring traditional financial system designs onto the blockchain isn't that easy; regulatory authority and decentralization are inherently conflicting. By the way, will those slow public chains really wait until the day of tokenized securities? I feel they might be overtaken instead. This logic is a bit like storytelling; reality might be much harsher...

View OriginalReply0