Here's a thought worth considering: instead of throttling legitimate users with strict rate limits, why not invest more effort into weeding out bot activity? Real users get frustrated when platforms restrict their access to combat automated traffic, but the real culprit sits elsewhere. Prioritizing bot detection and elimination over broad-brush rate limiting seems like the smarter play—keeps the community intact while actually solving the problem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BrokenDAO
· 5h ago
It sounds good, but this set of logic has already been tried on centralized platforms. What was the result? Costs increase, management starts to slack off, and finally they resort to crude throttling. On the decentralized side, it's even more ridiculous—who will detect bots? Can voting weight solve the problem? Those DAOs that claim to precisely eliminate bots, once they turn around, their incentive mechanisms become completely distorted.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurner
· 01-11 03:53
To be honest, I've heard this logic too many times. And the result? The platform still uses the same lazy solution—one-size-fits-all rate limiting. I really want to ask, with the actual cost of bot detection technology right there, who the hell is willing to spend that money? It's faster to just implement rate limiting directly.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayer
· 01-11 03:49
Nah, that's the real issue. The platform is just too lazy to accurately identify, so they prefer to cut everything off and block us.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWatcher
· 01-11 03:44
Haha, isn't this the harsh truth? The platform is always targeting us regular users.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 01-11 03:28
Blocking real users with this trick is really brilliant, but they should actually be plugging the bot loopholes instead.
Here's a thought worth considering: instead of throttling legitimate users with strict rate limits, why not invest more effort into weeding out bot activity? Real users get frustrated when platforms restrict their access to combat automated traffic, but the real culprit sits elsewhere. Prioritizing bot detection and elimination over broad-brush rate limiting seems like the smarter play—keeps the community intact while actually solving the problem.