On Friday, the US released unemployment rate data that initially looked quite good, but a closer analysis reveals several issues.
Let's start with the surface data—
The market expected an unemployment rate of 4.5%, and the actual figure was 4.4%. Generally, a lower number is considered positive. But this time, it's different.
The key change is that the unemployed population decreased from 7.78 million to 7.5 million, a drop of 280,000. Sounds promising, but we need to look carefully at where these 280,000 people came from.
**The Strange Aspects of the Data**
Among the unemployed, there is a special group called "people re-entering the labor force but still unemployed." This group was previously 2.6 million, and the latest data shows it at 2.34 million, a decrease of 260,000.
In other words, almost all of the decline in unemployment is due to this one category.
But the question is—what does the reduction of these 260,000 people actually mean? There are two completely opposite possibilities:
**First possibility (seems very positive)**
They found jobs. The labor market has absorbed these people, and employment is genuinely improving.
**Second possibility (a bit concerning)**
They gave up looking for work. They are no longer seeking employment and have exited the labor force altogether.
Which is it? The labor force participation rate provides the answer.
The data clearly shows: - The labor force participation rate dropped from 62.5% to 62.4% - The number of people leaving the labor force increased by 229,000
What does this indicate? It suggests that the decrease of 280,000 unemployed individuals is mainly not because they found jobs, but because they simply stopped looking.
**The truth is that it's this straightforward**
A declining unemployment rate does not necessarily mean the employment environment has genuinely improved. Against the backdrop of declining participation, this "pretty" unemployment rate is essentially a forced outcome—not because the market created enough opportunities, but because some workers chose to exit.
Many market participants are easily fooled by headlines, drawing conclusions based solely on the unemployment rate. But what truly matters is whether the labor force participation rate can rebound and whether job growth can continue. The recent data signals negative prospects on both fronts.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NftBankruptcyClub
· 15h ago
It's another case of changing disguises data. The unemployment rate looks good, but the labor force participation rate is falling, which is ridiculous.
People are getting richer but still claiming that employment is improving. I really can't take it.
The data looks good, but the real issue is that 229,000 people have given up looking for work altogether. That's the truth.
I've seen many such scams; the headlines look good, but everything inside is fake.
The key is the decline in participation rate, and no one has been paying attention to this.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmi
· 01-11 03:55
Another data magic show, I really can't hold it anymore.
View OriginalReply0
Liquidated_Larry
· 01-11 03:55
Another data scam, how many times have the Americans played this trick?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 01-11 03:51
It's the same old numbers game again. 229,000 people directly leaving the labor force—does that mean the unemployment rate is dropping? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamer
· 01-11 03:50
Another act of data magic, the unemployment rate looks great but people are leaving the scene, this is outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
CexIsBad
· 01-11 03:35
Once again, it's the same data smoke and mirrors. People giving up looking for jobs don't count as unemployed, so the unemployment rate naturally looks "better." It's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmi
· 01-11 03:34
It's the same old trick again. The impressive unemployment rate numbers are actually just people退出劳动力市场, which is truly remarkable.
People giving up on job hunting ≠ unemployment rate dropping. This logic should have been shattered long ago.
By the way, the Fed's interpretation of this data is about to be played out by Wall Street in new ways.
Wait, participation rate is still falling? Then there's more drama to come.
Don't celebrate the falling unemployment rate too early; the participation rate is the real indicator. Right now, it all looks fake.
On Friday, the US released unemployment rate data that initially looked quite good, but a closer analysis reveals several issues.
Let's start with the surface data—
The market expected an unemployment rate of 4.5%, and the actual figure was 4.4%. Generally, a lower number is considered positive. But this time, it's different.
The key change is that the unemployed population decreased from 7.78 million to 7.5 million, a drop of 280,000. Sounds promising, but we need to look carefully at where these 280,000 people came from.
**The Strange Aspects of the Data**
Among the unemployed, there is a special group called "people re-entering the labor force but still unemployed." This group was previously 2.6 million, and the latest data shows it at 2.34 million, a decrease of 260,000.
In other words, almost all of the decline in unemployment is due to this one category.
But the question is—what does the reduction of these 260,000 people actually mean? There are two completely opposite possibilities:
**First possibility (seems very positive)**
They found jobs. The labor market has absorbed these people, and employment is genuinely improving.
**Second possibility (a bit concerning)**
They gave up looking for work. They are no longer seeking employment and have exited the labor force altogether.
Which is it? The labor force participation rate provides the answer.
The data clearly shows:
- The labor force participation rate dropped from 62.5% to 62.4%
- The number of people leaving the labor force increased by 229,000
What does this indicate? It suggests that the decrease of 280,000 unemployed individuals is mainly not because they found jobs, but because they simply stopped looking.
**The truth is that it's this straightforward**
A declining unemployment rate does not necessarily mean the employment environment has genuinely improved. Against the backdrop of declining participation, this "pretty" unemployment rate is essentially a forced outcome—not because the market created enough opportunities, but because some workers chose to exit.
Many market participants are easily fooled by headlines, drawing conclusions based solely on the unemployment rate. But what truly matters is whether the labor force participation rate can rebound and whether job growth can continue. The recent data signals negative prospects on both fronts.