2026-01-11 07:23:16

Recently, US economic data has been surprisingly strong, catching many off guard. In Q3 2025, non-farm labor productivity grew at an annualized rate of 4.9%, marking a rare and robust rebound in recent decades. Even more interesting is that unit labor costs continue to decline consecutively, indicating that the US economy is indeed making progress in reducing costs and increasing efficiency.

However, the true underlying reasons remain quite divided in market opinion. The first reaction from most is to attribute it to AI-driven factors, but the situation isn't that simple. Some economic analysts have tempered expectations—data still isn't clear enough, and this rebound could merely be a cyclical bounce or simply companies cutting costs and adjusting employment structures as part of routine operations.

This sends a signal to the Federal Reserve: they need to consider whether this is a long-term trend or just short-term fluctuations. Misjudging this could lead to misaligned policy adjustments, which might cause the pace of policy changes to go awry. Such missteps would directly impact future interest rate trajectories and market sentiment.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GlueGuy

· 01-11 07:53

4.9% sounds impressive, but is AI really the savior or are companies just squeezing out more profits again? --- The Federal Reserve got it right this time; otherwise, the next wave could be another sharp downturn. --- Decline in unit labor costs... basically layoffs and wage cuts. Can this be considered a good thing? --- I believe in the idea of a cyclical rebound. But when the data isn't even stable yet and it's being portrayed as a long-term trend, it feels like there's some trickery involved. --- The interest rate turning point has arrived. Holders of cash should wake up. --- It's AI and data again, but in the end, it all depends on what the Federal Reserve thinks. --- Cost reduction and efficiency improvement for companies is a good thing? I feel like ordinary people are the ones who will suffer. --- If this wave also crashes, I wonder who will still trust economists. --- Driven by artificial intelligence? I think it's more about companies squeezing out extra resources before winter sets in. --- The 4.9% figure depends on how it's used. Don't deceive retail investors again.

View OriginalReply0

BrokenDAO

· 01-11 07:44

The data looks good, but don't be fooled. I've seen this "AI saving productivity" narrative too many times. In the end, it's still the old tricks of layoffs and pay cuts, with cyclical rebounds disguised as structural reforms. If the Fed gets led by market sentiment again this time, the credibility cost of interest rate policies will have to be paid further down the line.

View OriginalReply0

EthSandwichHero

· 01-11 07:41

This data increase doesn't seem right, feels a bit inflated... The Federal Reserve is really gambling this time... Is it another AI problem? Wake up, everyone. On the decline of unit costs, companies are probably frantically laying off employees. A 4.9% growth looks impressive, but digging deeper reveals all traps. Short-term rebound as long-term trend? That’s a sign of a looming crash. AI-driven? I think it’s just a numbers game driven by wage suppression. If the Federal Reserve makes a wrong judgment, interest rates can completely reverse. Cost reductions and staff layoffs are not surprising at all. The authenticity of this data still needs to be questioned... Is this a cyclical rebound or a new normal? It all depends on how many quarters it can sustain.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyLemur

· 01-11 07:37

Here are some distinctive style comments: **Comment 1:** Here we go again. Every time the data looks good, they hype AI; when things are unclear, they blame cyclical rebounds. The Federal Reserve really needs to think this through carefully. **Comment 2:** A 4.9% productivity growth sounds impressive, but whether costs are actually decreasing depends on how companies are squeezing margins. Don’t just attribute it all to AI. **Comment 3:** Basically, the data signals are chaotic. If the Federal Reserve makes a wrong judgment, interest rate policies will need constant adjustments, and retail investors will be on a roller coaster again. **Comment 4:** I'm a bit skeptical about how long this recovery can last. It feels more like companies are just doing routine cost-cutting and efficiency improvements. **Comment 5:** The hype around AI-driven growth has really been overblown. If the data isn’t clear enough, don’t jump to conclusions—be careful not to fall into traps. **Comment 6:** Unit labor costs are still falling. Is this really healthy? It seems like companies are squeezing the last bit of efficiency out of their workforce.

View OriginalReply0