RWA (Real Asset On-Chain) has been making a lot of noise recently, but many people haven't thought through a core issue: is this approach truly feasible?
Let me openly discuss three critical problems.
**First Challenge: How to On-Chain Business Secrets?**
Procurement orders, warehouse receipts, accounts receivable — these are all business secrets. You can't just put contract terms, trading partners, and amounts transparently on the public blockchain, right? That would mean publicly disclosing core commercial information.
This creates a bottleneck. Traditional RWA solutions often involve: data on-chain, but exposed transparently. As a result, no one dares to use them.
Dusk's Piecrust virtual machine takes a different approach — data is on-chain but encrypted. The data can be utilized and computed, but others cannot see the specific content. This satisfies the traceability requirement on the chain while protecting corporate trade secrets.
**Second Challenge: How Can Banks Lend with Confidence?**
Suppose you're a bank, and you have an accounts receivable to lend against. The other party says, "I have a contract worth 1 million, give me financing." How do you verify it's genuine?
If the data is encrypted, you can't see anything, so how do you perform risk control? It's a vicious cycle.
Dusk's solution is called "Auditable Privacy" — data remains encrypted, but you can verify it. Banks can confirm that an accounts receivable exists, the amount is real, and the trading partner is a compliant, licensed business. The key is: banks don't need to know whether this receivable is with Apple or a small factory. Verification and privacy are both maintained.
**Third Challenge: How to Enable Small Business Financing?**
Currently, in supply chains, only Tier 1 suppliers of leading companies can get loans. Why? Because banks trust the credit endorsement of the core enterprise. But Tier 2 and Tier 3 small factories, downstream plants, have broken credit chains and can't borrow a penny.
Where's the problem? Credit can't be transmitted without exposing business relationships. For example, the core company's reputation is excellent, but it doesn't want to publicly say, "I have a partnership with this small factory" — competitors can see the supplier list.
Dusk's Citadel protocol offers decentralized identity and privacy credit credentials. Imagine: the creditworthiness of the core enterprise can be layered like a watermark, passing down to downstream suppliers. Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers can use this credit credential to get financing from banks, while the details of the entire supply chain (who works with whom, specific transaction volumes) are protected.
**Why does Dusk have a chance?**
For RWA to truly explode, these three bottlenecks must be addressed: data privacy, verifiability, and credit transfer. These are not minor issues; they are the foundational infrastructure for the digital transformation of traditional finance.
Almost no competitors in the current space are taking this route because it is highly specialized and hardcore. It’s not a quick money game for trading tokens, but laying the trust infrastructure for the next-generation trade finance network.
Dusk's value is tied to this urgent need — the demand for compliant privacy-preserving computation is persistent and high-barrier. As long as RWA moves forward successfully, this infrastructure will become an essential necessity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZenZKPlayer
· 01-11 15:44
Well said, finally someone is addressing the real issues of RWA, not just hyping up the bubble.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 01-11 07:52
These three issues indeed hit the pain points of RWA, but to be honest, whether Dusk can really get it done depends on subsequent execution.
View OriginalReply0
PonziDetector
· 01-11 07:50
This is the real deal, not just hype.
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunner
· 01-11 07:47
To be honest, I've always been optimistic about privacy computing. It really depends on whether Dusk can truly be implemented in traditional finance; otherwise, it's just theoretical.
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghost
· 01-11 07:44
Wow, this is real infrastructure, not just some hype around worthless coins...
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemist
· 01-11 07:40
Damn, this is the kind of thinking I want to see. Privacy and verification can be compatible; RWA is the real game.
---
Dusk's perspective is indeed clever, but the problem is... will banks really cooperate?
---
Exactly, but small business financing probably still needs to wait. The credit transmission mechanism must be established first.
---
Isn't it just a combination of encryption + verification? It sounds simple, but how to implement it...
---
Finally, someone pointed out that RWA is a pseudo-demand until these three pitfalls are addressed.
---
Citadel protocol feels like genuine innovation; why haven't other projects thought of this?
---
The theory is perfect, but how to solve the issue of permanent on-chain data? There are still risks.
---
Compliance privacy computing indeed has high barriers. If Dusk really succeeds, competitors will find it hard to overtake.
RWA (Real Asset On-Chain) has been making a lot of noise recently, but many people haven't thought through a core issue: is this approach truly feasible?
Let me openly discuss three critical problems.
**First Challenge: How to On-Chain Business Secrets?**
Procurement orders, warehouse receipts, accounts receivable — these are all business secrets. You can't just put contract terms, trading partners, and amounts transparently on the public blockchain, right? That would mean publicly disclosing core commercial information.
This creates a bottleneck. Traditional RWA solutions often involve: data on-chain, but exposed transparently. As a result, no one dares to use them.
Dusk's Piecrust virtual machine takes a different approach — data is on-chain but encrypted. The data can be utilized and computed, but others cannot see the specific content. This satisfies the traceability requirement on the chain while protecting corporate trade secrets.
**Second Challenge: How Can Banks Lend with Confidence?**
Suppose you're a bank, and you have an accounts receivable to lend against. The other party says, "I have a contract worth 1 million, give me financing." How do you verify it's genuine?
If the data is encrypted, you can't see anything, so how do you perform risk control? It's a vicious cycle.
Dusk's solution is called "Auditable Privacy" — data remains encrypted, but you can verify it. Banks can confirm that an accounts receivable exists, the amount is real, and the trading partner is a compliant, licensed business. The key is: banks don't need to know whether this receivable is with Apple or a small factory. Verification and privacy are both maintained.
**Third Challenge: How to Enable Small Business Financing?**
Currently, in supply chains, only Tier 1 suppliers of leading companies can get loans. Why? Because banks trust the credit endorsement of the core enterprise. But Tier 2 and Tier 3 small factories, downstream plants, have broken credit chains and can't borrow a penny.
Where's the problem? Credit can't be transmitted without exposing business relationships. For example, the core company's reputation is excellent, but it doesn't want to publicly say, "I have a partnership with this small factory" — competitors can see the supplier list.
Dusk's Citadel protocol offers decentralized identity and privacy credit credentials. Imagine: the creditworthiness of the core enterprise can be layered like a watermark, passing down to downstream suppliers. Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers can use this credit credential to get financing from banks, while the details of the entire supply chain (who works with whom, specific transaction volumes) are protected.
**Why does Dusk have a chance?**
For RWA to truly explode, these three bottlenecks must be addressed: data privacy, verifiability, and credit transfer. These are not minor issues; they are the foundational infrastructure for the digital transformation of traditional finance.
Almost no competitors in the current space are taking this route because it is highly specialized and hardcore. It’s not a quick money game for trading tokens, but laying the trust infrastructure for the next-generation trade finance network.
Dusk's value is tied to this urgent need — the demand for compliant privacy-preserving computation is persistent and high-barrier. As long as RWA moves forward successfully, this infrastructure will become an essential necessity.