In the crypto ecosystem, what determines how far a project can go is often not how beautifully the technical documentation is written, but whether the economic model is cleverly designed. Take the storage network project Walrus as an example; its token $WAL is like a set of precise gear systems, with each link tightly interlocked, forming a self-consistent closed loop where the interests of all participants are aligned.
Simply put, many people understand $WAL as just a means to "pay for storage fees," but in reality, it serves much more than that. The token carries three completely different functional layers.
First, the **Utility Layer**—the most straightforward part. When users need to store data or retrieve files, they must spend $WAL to purchase these services. The greater the demand, the more tokens are consumed. This "burning" mechanism creates an inherent buying pressure for the token.
Next is the **Security Layer**. Want to become a storage node and earn rewards by participating in network operations? You need to stake $WAL as an "entry ticket." This mechanism serves multiple purposes: locking up circulating tokens to reduce price volatility; the amount staked determines the node's influence and reward share, incentivizing long-term commitment; and the interests of nodes and the network are deeply intertwined, ensuring no one sabotages their own stake.
Then there's the **Governance Layer**. WAL holders can vote on core protocol parameters—how storage fees are set, how new tokens are released, how the incentive pool is allocated... This transforms into a form of ownership certificate, endowing the token with investment attributes.
These three layers are interconnected. Users' storage demands drive token consumption → nodes stake tokens to maintain the network → governance rights benefit long-term holders. Once this flywheel starts spinning, it creates a self-reinforcing ecological feedback loop. That’s why many storage projects can maintain relatively stable token values—because demand, security, and rights are truly unified.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SeeYouInFourYears
· 11m ago
Damn, someone finally explained WAL clearly. I used to think it was just a storage coin.
This three-layer design is indeed interesting, especially the staking part that really locks up liquidity.
But to be fair, the premise is having real storage needs; otherwise, no matter how perfect the model is, it's just theoretical.
How long the Walrus flywheel can keep spinning depends on the actual user base; right now, it's still a question mark.
With WAL's price so volatile, how come the staking mechanism can't stay stable?
View OriginalReply0
ChainDetective
· 18h ago
Wow, this is what real token design looks like, not those purely money-grabbing schemes.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTrader
· 01-11 07:56
Details are nailed down tightly, no wonder Walrus can establish a foothold.
---
Once the economic model is designed well, it becomes invincible; technology is secondary.
---
The three-layer closed-loop concept is quite brilliant, but few projects can execute it effectively.
---
That's correct, but there are very few storage projects that can truly get the flywheel spinning.
---
This is why holding WAL long-term is important, not just for trading.
---
The analysis of the staking mechanism as a multi-purpose solution is excellent, directly solving the volatility issue.
---
Yes, yes, yes, the burning mechanism is the fundamental reason why tokens have value.
---
Governance rights are very crucial; otherwise, what's the difference from a worthless token.
---
I've heard the flywheel theory a hundred times, but there are indeed few projects that can really get it spinning.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTrendSister
· 01-11 07:55
This model design is indeed excellent, with a three-layer system of burn + staking + governance, making it hard to find any flaws.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImposter
· 01-11 07:51
Wow, this economic model is indeed quite impressive, thinking more deeply than most projects.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 01-11 07:39
Wow, this economic model design is indeed awesome. The burning mechanism combined with staking and governance voting really ties everyone together on the same boat.
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuck
· 01-11 07:38
Wow, this three-layer design is truly brilliant, much clearer than most projects.
In the crypto ecosystem, what determines how far a project can go is often not how beautifully the technical documentation is written, but whether the economic model is cleverly designed. Take the storage network project Walrus as an example; its token $WAL is like a set of precise gear systems, with each link tightly interlocked, forming a self-consistent closed loop where the interests of all participants are aligned.
Simply put, many people understand $WAL as just a means to "pay for storage fees," but in reality, it serves much more than that. The token carries three completely different functional layers.
First, the **Utility Layer**—the most straightforward part. When users need to store data or retrieve files, they must spend $WAL to purchase these services. The greater the demand, the more tokens are consumed. This "burning" mechanism creates an inherent buying pressure for the token.
Next is the **Security Layer**. Want to become a storage node and earn rewards by participating in network operations? You need to stake $WAL as an "entry ticket." This mechanism serves multiple purposes: locking up circulating tokens to reduce price volatility; the amount staked determines the node's influence and reward share, incentivizing long-term commitment; and the interests of nodes and the network are deeply intertwined, ensuring no one sabotages their own stake.
Then there's the **Governance Layer**. WAL holders can vote on core protocol parameters—how storage fees are set, how new tokens are released, how the incentive pool is allocated... This transforms into a form of ownership certificate, endowing the token with investment attributes.
These three layers are interconnected. Users' storage demands drive token consumption → nodes stake tokens to maintain the network → governance rights benefit long-term holders. Once this flywheel starts spinning, it creates a self-reinforcing ecological feedback loop. That’s why many storage projects can maintain relatively stable token values—because demand, security, and rights are truly unified.