A certain project issued tokens using 8 wallet addresses in one go, which indeed sparked market controversy. Many community members have expressed that this method of token issuance easily leads to information asymmetry—institutions and insiders pre-position themselves, and retail investors often enter at high points. The most outrageous part is that some investors feel they are always catching the bag at the worst possible time. This multi-account token issuance strategy appears to diversify risk on the surface, but in reality, it severely dilutes the voice of ordinary investors. The transparency of Web3 projects should be an advantage, but such operations raise doubts—are retail investors truly part of the community, or are they just targets for being exploited?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Layer2Arbitrageur
· 9h ago
lmao 8 wallets = poor gas optimization + obvious wealth concentration. mathematically suboptimal distribution if you ask me. but yeah, insiders pumping before retail enters is literally arbitrage 101... they're just extracting MEV from price discovery. predictable tbh.
Reply0
GasWastingMaximalist
· 01-11 07:56
Is this the same old trick again, can 8 wallets really fool us?
Retail investors are always the last to take the fall, wake up everyone.
What happened to the promised transparency? Is this Web3? Laughable.
That's why I only play meme coins; it's all just gambling anyway.
One word: run.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiGreenie
· 01-11 07:55
Is it the same old trick of cutting leeks again? Wake up, brothers.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 01-11 07:52
8 wallets dumping together, isn't this just blatantly harvesting the little guys?
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidator
· 01-11 07:50
8 wallets? Is this what you call "decentralization"? A quick check of on-chain data reveals the true nature, and the consensus mechanism is just a facade.
View OriginalReply0
PensionDestroyer
· 01-11 07:44
Here we go again with this set? 8 wallets are just new tricks to cut leeks.
This is Web3, transparency has become a joke.
It's always us who end up holding the bag in the end, truly ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofster
· 01-11 07:44
nah, "trustless" distribution turning into insider farming—classic move tbh. technically speaking, this is just poorly implemented tokenomics masquerading as decentralization.
Reply0
ReverseTrendSister
· 01-11 07:33
Another scheme to cut leeks, 8 wallets? Just come clean already.
A certain project issued tokens using 8 wallet addresses in one go, which indeed sparked market controversy. Many community members have expressed that this method of token issuance easily leads to information asymmetry—institutions and insiders pre-position themselves, and retail investors often enter at high points. The most outrageous part is that some investors feel they are always catching the bag at the worst possible time. This multi-account token issuance strategy appears to diversify risk on the surface, but in reality, it severely dilutes the voice of ordinary investors. The transparency of Web3 projects should be an advantage, but such operations raise doubts—are retail investors truly part of the community, or are they just targets for being exploited?