【CoinDesk】Ethereum founder Vitalik recently wrote that there is still a lot of work to be done for decentralized stablecoins in the current stage of the crypto industry. He listed three urgent challenges to overcome.
First is the issue of price anchoring. Instead of continuing to fixate on the US dollar, it’s better to find a more scientific indicator to track. After all, the original intention of establishing a “national resistance” is to shed dependence on the US dollar, so that true independence can be achieved.
Second, the design of oracles is crucial. If oracles are easily bought off by large capital, protocols will need to set prohibitively high extraction costs to defend themselves, making attacks more expensive than the protocol’s own value. Clearly, this is not a sustainable solution; a decentralized and uncontrollable oracle mechanism must be built.
The third pain point is yield competitiveness. Many decentralized stablecoins have failed to attract large amounts of capital because their yields are too low. Especially when compared to other staking products, they often offer several percentage points less. In the long run, this yield gap will become the ceiling for stablecoin growth.
These three issues are interconnected. To truly promote the implementation of decentralized stablecoins, these challenges must be addressed.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaMaskVictim
· 01-14 07:32
Oracles being bought off by big capital is really a major flaw. It seems that many projects are stuck here, and this should have been prioritized long ago.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTester
· 01-12 09:32
Talking about decentralized stablecoins again, politely called ideal, bluntly said, still haven't figured it out yet.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-11 08:09
Oracles being bought off by big capital is really a common topic; it feels like there's no way to get around it forever...
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirrel
· 01-11 08:06
In plain terms, today's decentralized stablecoins are a mess—they can't shake off the US dollar and are manipulated by big players, with returns so low they're almost useless... Vitalik is right, but it seems there's no good solution in the short term either?
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 01-11 08:05
It's a good point to say that oracles are compromised. Many projects nowadays simply can't afford the high costs to prevent it. We really need to think of some solutions.
View OriginalReply0
YieldHunter
· 01-11 07:52
honestly the oracle problem is way more critical than vitalik's making it sound... if you look at the data, every defi exploit in the last cycle traced back to oracle manipulation. setting fees so high they become economically unfeasible? that's just kicking the can. sustainable returns mean nothing if your price feed gets captured
Reply0
GhostChainLoyalist
· 01-11 07:50
Oracles are indeed a big pitfall; if you're not careful, whales can manipulate them... Vitalik is right.
Vitalik discusses the three major challenges of decentralized stablecoins: oracles, USD dependency, and yield dilemma
【CoinDesk】Ethereum founder Vitalik recently wrote that there is still a lot of work to be done for decentralized stablecoins in the current stage of the crypto industry. He listed three urgent challenges to overcome.
First is the issue of price anchoring. Instead of continuing to fixate on the US dollar, it’s better to find a more scientific indicator to track. After all, the original intention of establishing a “national resistance” is to shed dependence on the US dollar, so that true independence can be achieved.
Second, the design of oracles is crucial. If oracles are easily bought off by large capital, protocols will need to set prohibitively high extraction costs to defend themselves, making attacks more expensive than the protocol’s own value. Clearly, this is not a sustainable solution; a decentralized and uncontrollable oracle mechanism must be built.
The third pain point is yield competitiveness. Many decentralized stablecoins have failed to attract large amounts of capital because their yields are too low. Especially when compared to other staking products, they often offer several percentage points less. In the long run, this yield gap will become the ceiling for stablecoin growth.
These three issues are interconnected. To truly promote the implementation of decentralized stablecoins, these challenges must be addressed.