2026-01-13 10:34:14

When participating in project interactions, community building, or making investment decisions, it is recommended to prioritize projects with the following characteristics: strong fundraising lineup, transparent core team identities, high community engagement, actual returns generated, and subsequent plans after TGE. At least a few of these points should be met. Frankly, good project teams care about their reputation. They won't easily ruin their brand, so these indicators often signify long-term commitments from the project team. When screening, these five dimensions are effective tools for quickly assessing the quality of a project.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoPhoenix

· 6h ago

Yet another day of the market teaching us a lesson. After falling for so long, someone finally spoke sense. The five dimensions are quite eye-opening; basically, it’s about whether the project team is truly investing their money and whether they have the guts to keep going. Simple and straightforward, but so accurate.

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_ngmi

· 6h ago

This standard sounds good, but in actual operation, the most difficult part is still distinguishing whether the "community activity level" is truly from genuine fans or just bots spamming...

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingersFOMO

· 6h ago

That's right, these five points are indeed the ultimate tricks to avoid pitfalls. But to be honest, most people still go all in based on intuition and don't even check who the investors are.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 6h ago

Speaking of which, these five points are indeed hard indicators for screening projects, especially the backing of major institutions, which can really save a lot of trouble. --- The most feared are teams that are semi-invisible. What do they mean by long-term commitment? I think it's suspicious. --- High community activity is the easiest to fake. You need to see if it's genuine discussion or just bots spamming, which can be seen through immediately. --- I usually pass on projects that have no plans after TGE. That’s basically telling you there’s no follow-up. --- In simple terms, it’s about whether the project team values their reputation. Some teams really don’t care at all. --- Returns depend on sustainability, not those sudden, fleeting surges. That doesn’t count. --- I’ve also seen projects with luxurious funding but dead community engagement. Just having money backing isn’t enough.

View OriginalReply0

screenshot_gains

· 6h ago

To be honest, all five points seem correct, but when it comes to choosing projects, it's still easy to stumble. A fancy fundraising list doesn't guarantee success down the line.

View OriginalReply0