2026-01-13 10:36:28

Recently, I took a deep dive into transaction data on the BSC chain and discovered some interesting phenomena. A group of "smart money" strategies are particularly strange—on the surface, they appear to be copying trades in bulk, but there's no sign of fund concentration at the source, nor any apparent connection between these wallets. It’s like a bunch of independent accounts popping up out of nowhere.

It took quite some time to uncover the clue: these seasoned traders are all using the same trading bot. The cleverness of this tool lies in helping users manage on-chain transactions more flexibly, avoid tracking risks, and maintain operational independence. For professional traders, this kind of solution clearly greatly reduces the recognizability of on-chain activity.

If you're also studying the flow of funds within the BSC ecosystem, this detail is worth paying attention to.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PanicSeller69

· 6h ago

Wow, this move is brilliant. No wonder I couldn't track the source, it turns out it's all just bots playing tricks.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTradingGuru

· 6h ago

Ha, it's the same old story, Bot players are getting more and more competitive --- So on-chain "independent wallets" are just a facade, behind them are all operated by the same mind --- This kind of tactic has been common for a long time, no wonder tracking fund flows is so difficult --- But honestly, this kind of risk-avoidance logic is a bit over the top --- Smart money uses Bots, how can follow-the-trend retail investors survive --- Wait, is this about money laundering or normal trading strategies? Can't tell the difference --- I just want to know if these tools all require payment, and if the cost is high --- It seems that in the future, we need to be more cautious when looking at on-chain data, surface-level correlations might all be fake --- By the way, do regulators know about this kind of practice?

View OriginalReply0

UncleWhale

· 6h ago

Wow, this technique is amazing. No wonder they can't track this group of people. Looks like I need to upgrade the tracking tools, or else I might get played. That's why smart money always stays ahead. So, how should retail investors play... Great details, this analysis is solid. Speaking of bots being so useful, no wonder big players don't use main accounts. Many people make a great force; this is the true picture on the chain. Indeed, I should study this set of logic.

View OriginalReply0

GreenCandleCollector

· 6h ago

Is the operation so covert? No wonder I never understood who was manipulating the market. Now I understand, it turns out big players are all playing this set. It's both bots and identity obfuscation; the on-chain privacy war has escalated. So, the transparency of trading data is fake; the real smart money has long been playing tricks. If such tools are discovered by exchanges, the consequences are unthinkable. Wait, isn't this just another way of saying on-chain money laundering? It feels like many seemingly independent wallets are actually operated by the same group behind the scenes. We need to stay alert; maybe the next copycat trap is right in front of us. Are bots really that effective? It feels like they're skirting the rules.

View OriginalReply0

LightningLady

· 6h ago

Wow, this technique is really discreet. No wonder it took so long to find any clues.

View OriginalReply0