2026-01-13 11:20:32

There's a saying I couldn't quite understand until I had fallen a few times in the crypto world—flashy strategies often die the fastest, while the simpler methods tend to last the longest.

I still remember that night, staring at the 1800U in my account, which was my entire month's salary. Someone in the group next to me was sharing a screenshot of tenfold profits, while I was debating whether to add ham to my instant noodles tonight. It was then that I realized, in the crypto world, those who can truly survive are not the ones showing off their trades all day.

Three years have passed in the blink of an eye, and now I can confidently say that relying on this "foolish method" that my peers mock has turned 1800U into a six-figure sum. For players with a principal no more than 2000U, this approach really works.

**The first key point: Don't overcomplicate choosing coins**

At first, I was that kind of person—spending eight hours a day studying indicators, going through MACD, Bollinger Bands, KDJ, RSI all over again, afraid of missing any detail. But the result? Every time I bought, the price dropped; every time I sold, it rose. I lost money fast.

Later, I realized—retail investors don't need to compete with professional institutions in technical analysis. I focused on one signal: a daily MACD golden cross, and it had to be above the zero line. It sounds ridiculously simple, but this rule has saved me countless times. A golden cross above the zero line is a strong signal; those below are often traps set to deceive you. Don't be fooled by false rebounds. In the end, in the crypto world, it's not about who has the strongest technical skills, but who can survive the longest.

**The second key point: Operate based on just one line**

This is my ironclad rule: hold when the price is above the line, sell when it drops below. After buying in, choose a support line, and if it breaks, don't hesitate—no rebound or bottom-fishing. Many people die here—they keep hoping for a rebound, but end up getting trapped after a sudden drop limit.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityWitch

· 8h ago

Really, I deeply feel this logic: the key to winning is just living longer, don't bother with all those fancy tricks. Oh wait, 1800U three years to six figures? That number doesn't seem quite right, brother. Laughing to death, it's the MACD golden cross routine again, I've seen too many people crash and burn relying on this. Break the support line and run, it's easy to say but hard to do; when the market really drops, who doesn't want to buy cheap? Honestly, small investors are just sitting ducks; even the dumbest methods require a bit of luck to succeed. This article is a classic case of survivor bias; successful people love to summarize their experiences. Starting with 1800U is indeed exciting; I was directly wiped out with just over 2000U back then. Looking at these posts now, I feel quite speechless. MACD golden cross above the zero line... Oh my, this is the same thing I believed in three years ago.

View OriginalReply0

DegenRecoveryGroup

· 8h ago

Damn, 1800U to six figures? This guy is serious, but I believe this logic. Once you see through it, it's about being ruthless with stop-losses. While others are betting on rebounds, you just run. Staying alive is the hard truth. Simple strategies are truly the best, much longer-lasting than those who spend all day studying indicators. Honestly, when I see someone still researching technical indicators on an eight-hour chart, I just want to laugh. Can charts save lives? I've heard of the daily chart golden cross strategy, but how many actually implement it? Most are just daydreaming. Uncomplicated strategies can withstand a bear market; flashy ones have already gone to zero. Break the support line and get out—those who can't do this deserve to be trapped. It all seems to be a matter of psychological resilience. Technical skills are secondary; the key is who can resist being soft-handed. Six figures sound great, but the prerequisite is actually being able to execute stop-losses. That's difficult for most people. Small investors playing coins ultimately win by surviving long enough; everything else is just虚的.

View OriginalReply0

ValidatorViking

· 8h ago

honestly the "just hodl simple signals" playbook hits different when you're actually battle-tested on it... zero-axis macd gold cross sounds almost too clean to be true but then you realize most people just get slashed by their own overconfidence. survivor bias or not, the math checks out—complexity kills more positions than poor entries ever could.

Reply0

HashRateHustler

· 8h ago

1800U eating instant noodles to six figures, this story sounds comfortable, but I think the key is to stay alive. Forget about MACD golden cross, living longer is the real winner. Break the support line and run, it sounds simple, but can really quit the itch? I always want to wait a bit longer, but the result is always being trapped. This method is indeed blunt, but for small retail investors like us, it seems there’s no better way. Just consider it as buying insurance for yourself. Choosing coins is not complicated, and operating with discipline sounds like talking about life philosophy, but in the crypto circle, it seems to be so realistic. The flashy ones are dead, and those who survive are the ones working quietly. That’s a bit harsh to hear. I believe half in the six-figure range, but the logic is indeed sound. The key is whether you can really hold that support line.

View OriginalReply0

MeltdownSurvivalist

· 8h ago

That moment when 1800U eats instant noodles really hit me, honestly, it's way more heartbreaking than those motivational stories about earning millions daily. Wait, can a golden cross above the zero axis really turn into a six-figure amount? It feels so simple, but I would believe it if there's some complexity involved. Honestly, I'm just afraid I belong to the type of person who "knows but still chooses to risk death." This simple method sounds comfortable, but can I really resist bottom fishing when executing it... I doubt myself. Treating 1800U as a monthly salary is really heartbreaking; are we really just gambling with our living expenses?

View OriginalReply0

FlatlineTrader

· 8h ago

Hey, I've heard this theory so many times, but I haven't seen anyone truly stick with it. Making 1800U to six figures is indeed impressive, but the problem is most people can't hold on for more than a year. I've also used the MACD above the zero line, but it's too much of a test on your mentality. As soon as it drops three points, you want to sell everything. Compared to clumsy methods, I think what's even harder is not to look at the market. Sticking to a support line sounds simple, but in actual operation, your hands really tremble. This is the secret to surviving longer — it's not about making quick money, but about not dying.

View OriginalReply0