2026-01-13 11:22:01

#美国民主党BlueVault Monero (XMR), as a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has incorporated many considerations in its design — transaction initiators, recipients, transfer amounts, and even network layer data can all be anonymized. This is also why it emphasizes untraceability and asset fungibility.

It uses the CryptoNote protocol framework at its core, and the project team has always adhered to an anti-ASIC mining approach, pursuing decentralization. Through dynamic block sizes and a tail emission mechanism, it ensures network security and long-term stability.

From the current on-chain performance, the main driving force behind this wave of market activity still comes from on-chain data. Seeing the 700 level now, there’s basically no suspense.

But how the subsequent market will develop and how to plan specifically varies from person to person. What do you all think?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ContractTester

· 2h ago

Hmm, XMR is indeed hardcore, with excellent privacy features, but exchanges all dare not list it. 700 really feels like there's no suspense, just unsure if it will get stuck later. The privacy coin path is becoming increasingly difficult, with mounting regulatory pressure. Is on-chain data enough? I think market sentiment also plays a role. I appreciate the anti-ASIC design, but how long it can last is really hard to say. Monero's anonymity is truly impressive, but that has also become its original sin. Let's wait and see; after 700, we'll talk. It's still a bit early to enter now.

View OriginalReply0

FomoAnxiety

· 5h ago

700 really has no imagination, mainly just following on-chain data, a bit boring. I've been optimistic about xmr's privacy design for a long time, but the exchange restrictions are too many, which is really frustrating. The anti-ASIC aspect of this project is well done, but how long it can last depends on what happens next. How to say it, wait for a pullback to buy in, this wave of rally feels a bit fake. The story of privacy coins has been told for so long, but how many are actually used?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-26d7f434

· 5h ago

Position 700 is indeed stable, let's see if it can continue to break through later Monero's privacy design is really solid, but exchanges are also under a lot of pressure I'm quite optimistic about the anti-ASIC approach; decentralization is the right path How it will go from here depends on on-chain data, but anyway, I am hodling

View OriginalReply0

FrogInTheWell

· 5h ago

700 is indeed right in front of us, but the real test is whether we can hold it, right? Privacy coins have never lacked stories, but I'm just worried it might be another paper prosperity. The anti-ASIC logic has been around for years, but in the end, it still depends on whether we can truly resist the "improvement" of capital—honestly, I'm not very optimistic. On-chain data looks good, but that doesn't mean the market will be good later. We need to be cautious so we don't get cut.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 5h ago

Haha, XMR this wave is indeed speaking through on-chain data, 700 is not far away Privacy coins... policy risk still needs to be considered, friends I like the anti-ASIC aspect, a true decentralization idealist By the way, how will it go from here, who has confidence? The tail issuance mechanism design is really thoughtful, maximizing stability Wait, what is BlueVault doing? Is the US Democratic Party still playing with crypto? I bet on the 700 level, what about you guys? Monero's privacy features are hyped up quite a bit, but how's the actual adoption rate? With such strong on-chain data, how else can we interpret it? Just follow and eat But the prospects for privacy coins... well, it still depends on each country's attitude

View OriginalReply0