Incentive design beats marketing every time. When you actually reward participation and let value flow back to participants, the whole system becomes self-sustaining. That's the difference between projects that fizzle and ones that stick around. Some teams are getting this right—they've designed their fee mechanisms so carefully that the economics naturally encourage long-term engagement. It's less about hype, more about fundamentals working as intended.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZenMiner
· 01-13 12:00
This is true ecological design, not the typical money-grabbing scheme.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBarbecue
· 01-13 11:59
Economics design is really the ultimate gameplay, more effective than any marketing.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkie
· 01-13 11:57
Really? Incentive mechanisms are the key. Projects that only focus on marketing will eventually fade away.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 01-13 11:52
That's true, but in reality, most projects still spend money on marketing... Economic design can really save lives.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBuffet
· 01-13 11:38
Really, once the incentive mechanism is well-designed, it can operate independently without daily hype.
Incentive design beats marketing every time. When you actually reward participation and let value flow back to participants, the whole system becomes self-sustaining. That's the difference between projects that fizzle and ones that stick around. Some teams are getting this right—they've designed their fee mechanisms so carefully that the economics naturally encourage long-term engagement. It's less about hype, more about fundamentals working as intended.