Once heralded as the next big thing in Web3, decentralized physical infrastructure networks seemed poised to revolutionize how we think about resource sharing and incentive mechanisms. Yet lately, the conversation has quieted considerably.
DePIN projects promised to tokenize real-world infrastructure—from computing power to bandwidth to sensor networks. The vision was compelling: reward participants directly for contributing physical resources, bypassing traditional intermediaries.
But here's where things get fuzzy. Market sentiment has shifted. Many projects that launched with considerable hype now struggle to maintain traction. Token prices have cooled. User adoption hasn't matched early expectations. The infrastructure buildout moves slower than anticipated.
So is DePIN genuinely dead, or just maturing? Perhaps it's somewhere in between—the space is consolidating, separating serious projects from speculative ones. Real utility cases are emerging, but they're fewer and more niche than the hype cycle suggested.
The honest take: DePIN isn't dead. It's just entering a much harder phase where execution matters far more than narrative.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-addcaaf7
· 4h ago
Haha, another story of "not dead, just sleeping"... The token has been cold for half a year, and you're still talking about maturation?
View OriginalReply0
UncommonNPC
· 7h ago
Another overhyped track, is it starting to "mature" now? Basically, it just means the retail investors have been squeezed dry.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 7h ago
Another story of "not dead, just adjusting"... Tired of hearing it, brother. In this wave of DePIN, it either really delivers something or it’s game over.
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVoter
· 7h ago
Oh no, it's another saying of "It didn't die, it's just in hibernation"... I've heard it too many times.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBuffet
· 7h ago
Another story of "not dead, just in hibernation," sounds nice, but the coin price tells the truth.
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMe
· 7h ago
To be honest, this wave of DePIN has been overhyped. Now it's time to get serious and do the work. Projects whose token prices drop and reveal their true nature deserve to be eliminated; only truly useful things will naturally survive.
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurker
· 7h ago
To be honest, the DePIN wave was blown out of proportion. Now that things have calmed down, it's actually a good thing. Projects that only tell stories should have died long ago, while those with real substance now have more room to grow.
Has DePIN Lost Its Momentum?
Once heralded as the next big thing in Web3, decentralized physical infrastructure networks seemed poised to revolutionize how we think about resource sharing and incentive mechanisms. Yet lately, the conversation has quieted considerably.
DePIN projects promised to tokenize real-world infrastructure—from computing power to bandwidth to sensor networks. The vision was compelling: reward participants directly for contributing physical resources, bypassing traditional intermediaries.
But here's where things get fuzzy. Market sentiment has shifted. Many projects that launched with considerable hype now struggle to maintain traction. Token prices have cooled. User adoption hasn't matched early expectations. The infrastructure buildout moves slower than anticipated.
So is DePIN genuinely dead, or just maturing? Perhaps it's somewhere in between—the space is consolidating, separating serious projects from speculative ones. Real utility cases are emerging, but they're fewer and more niche than the hype cycle suggested.
The honest take: DePIN isn't dead. It's just entering a much harder phase where execution matters far more than narrative.