Judging the quality of a crypto project often follows similar routines: first look at the price increase, then check discussion popularity, and finally assess community activity. This approach works well in the early stages of a bull market, but once sentiment wanes, it immediately becomes ineffective.
Projects that truly survive often show a stark contrast—they are not necessarily the loudest or most hyped, but rather those that are hardest to replace. Dusk in the privacy track embodies this ethos; it never seeks to be immediately stunning but focuses on doing something that "others can't easily take away."
**Why is privacy important? It's not a moral issue; it's about solid risk control.**
Transaction information, asset allocation, and participation paths are all exposed, which brings more than just the seemingly beautiful word "transparency." It also introduces risks of targeting, copying, and even misjudgment. Maintaining necessary information boundaries within a legal and compliant framework is the real-world need. Dusk aims to address this pain point.
However, the long-term problem with privacy projects is also obvious—most look like lab products, and ordinary users often can't tell whether or when to use them. This causes even the best technology to become tools for small circles.
Dusk's approach is somewhat different. It doesn't aim to overhaul the entire financial ecosystem but instead supplements existing scenarios that are difficult to develop on-chain. This "filling the gaps" positioning may be overlooked early on, but once scaled, it becomes foundational infrastructure.
**Regarding the $DUSK value logic, it is more aligned with usage demand rather than emotional hype.**
As long as the network is actively used, the token has a reason to exist; if no one uses it, even the most beautiful story can't hold up. This is not very friendly to short-term capital, but it instead builds a trust foundation for long-term holders—judgment criteria are straightforward enough, no need to guess market sentiment daily.
This is the current state of the privacy track and Dusk: not seeking to be a hot topic, but aiming to become a standard.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DancingCandles
· 01-13 12:55
Why do I feel like this logic is a bit over the top? Privacy is important, but how many people actually use it?
The selling point is too "cold," and in the early stages, it's indeed easy to be squeezed out.
But to be fair, projects that reach scale are usually of this nature; most story-tellers have already failed.
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtist
· 01-13 12:55
It sounds good, but I see that DUSK's MACD still hasn't had a golden cross. This rebound is just a weak retracement, and the technical signals are full of danger. But on the other hand, privacy needs are indeed a necessity. Even if I'm trapped, I still have to wait for the user base to grow...
View OriginalReply0
RugDocScientist
· 01-13 12:54
Well said, truly great projects are built through gradual accumulation.
Privacy has indeed been demonized; it's really just a matter of security.
View OriginalReply0
DAOTruant
· 01-13 12:51
Basically, no one is trading or paying attention, which is the real reason it survives.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBot
· 01-13 12:39
Another article praising Dusk. Honestly, I can't see what's different.
Judging the quality of a crypto project often follows similar routines: first look at the price increase, then check discussion popularity, and finally assess community activity. This approach works well in the early stages of a bull market, but once sentiment wanes, it immediately becomes ineffective.
Projects that truly survive often show a stark contrast—they are not necessarily the loudest or most hyped, but rather those that are hardest to replace. Dusk in the privacy track embodies this ethos; it never seeks to be immediately stunning but focuses on doing something that "others can't easily take away."
**Why is privacy important? It's not a moral issue; it's about solid risk control.**
Transaction information, asset allocation, and participation paths are all exposed, which brings more than just the seemingly beautiful word "transparency." It also introduces risks of targeting, copying, and even misjudgment. Maintaining necessary information boundaries within a legal and compliant framework is the real-world need. Dusk aims to address this pain point.
However, the long-term problem with privacy projects is also obvious—most look like lab products, and ordinary users often can't tell whether or when to use them. This causes even the best technology to become tools for small circles.
Dusk's approach is somewhat different. It doesn't aim to overhaul the entire financial ecosystem but instead supplements existing scenarios that are difficult to develop on-chain. This "filling the gaps" positioning may be overlooked early on, but once scaled, it becomes foundational infrastructure.
**Regarding the $DUSK value logic, it is more aligned with usage demand rather than emotional hype.**
As long as the network is actively used, the token has a reason to exist; if no one uses it, even the most beautiful story can't hold up. This is not very friendly to short-term capital, but it instead builds a trust foundation for long-term holders—judgment criteria are straightforward enough, no need to guess market sentiment daily.
This is the current state of the privacy track and Dusk: not seeking to be a hot topic, but aiming to become a standard.