DeFi has created liquidity over the past few years, but the problems are also obvious—capital utilization is too low, and impermanent loss is hard to recover from. The root cause remains the rigid constant product model, which fails to fully grasp the real-time market changes.



Walrus Protocol addresses this pain point. They have developed a concept called dynamic liquidity algorithm, with a straightforward core idea: instead of a fixed pricing curve, it automatically adjusts based on market conditions. The system constantly monitors the volatility, buy-sell pressure, and market depth of trading pairs, then intelligently modifies the liquidity curve. When the market is stable, it concentrates efforts to enhance trading depth; during high volatility, it automatically widens the price range to protect LPs. According to actual data, this approach has increased capital efficiency by over 60%, and reduced average slippage by 55%.

Another impressive feature is the layered liquidity architecture. It divides liquidity pools into three tiers: the core layer strictly maintains main token pairs for the most stable returns; the enhanced layer covers a broader range of assets, balancing risk and reward; the innovative layer reserves space for new tokens and experimental trading pairs. Each layer has customized risk tools and yield models, allowing LPs to precisely choose their configurations based on risk preferences. This not only optimizes resource allocation but also meets the market’s diverse needs.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeDodgervip
· 2h ago
Wait, a 60% increase in capital efficiency? Isn't that number a bit too idealistic? Have you tested it in real trading?
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larryvip
· 7h ago
A 60% efficiency improvement sounds impressive, but how was this data measured? Can it be reproduced in real-world scenarios?
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlicevip
· 7h ago
Wait, dynamically adjusting the curve sounds pretty good, but can it actually work in practice? I'm worried it might just be theoretical.
View OriginalReply0
faded_wojak.ethvip
· 7h ago
It sounds like another "revolutionary" plan, but how is the 60% efficiency increase calculated? Has it been tested in real trading?
View OriginalReply0
GhostWalletSleuthvip
· 7h ago
Hmm... The idea of dynamically adjusting the curve is good, but how many can actually implement it? --- A 60% efficiency improvement, just listen to it. The real key is being able to consistently reproduce it in practice. --- Layered architecture sounds nice, but the question is, what guarantees the new token layer? How to hedge risks? --- Compared to these technical wrappers, I more want to know how large the actual TVL can support. --- Constant product is indeed old-fashioned, but can Walrus's approach truly avoid impermanent loss? It still feels like just shifting it around.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)