2026-01-13 12:33:28

Interestingly, the same amount of over 400,000 USD might only cover the expenses of a single academic conference in the scientific research field, but in the crypto world, it becomes the entire savings of many retail investors. This huge psychological gap reflects two completely different understandings of capital—on one side, it is insignificant from a macro perspective, and on the other side, it is the entire reliance in personal life. Market participants' risk tolerance and capital planning vary greatly; some treat idle money as bets, while others have invested their living expenses. As a result, the impact of the same event can be entirely different for different people. There is indeed a huge gap in people's perception of returns and risks.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StablecoinSkeptic

· 8h ago

$400,000 in the academic world is just a conference registration fee, but in the crypto world, it can ruin a family... The gap is really huge. People's risk tolerance varies so greatly; at the end of the day, it's all about information gaps and different gambling tendencies. So, the most frightening thing in this circle isn't the price drop of coins, but someone putting their life savings all-in. That's why I always feel someone should properly explain what risk management is... but I guess no one will listen. The perception gap is too big; some are happy with a 10% profit, while others lose 50% and keep adding to their positions. Two different universes in the same market.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerMiner

· 9h ago

400,000 dollars really depends on perspective; in the scientific community, it's just a drop in the bucket, but for us, it's a matter of life and death.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterNoLoss

· 9h ago

$400,000, to put it simply, depends on how you spend it—some treat it as pocket money, others as their lifeline, and the difference is huge. That's how the crypto world is; the funds for the wealthy are the entire assets of the poor. No wonder some people can't sleep during a downturn. That's why I never go all in. Playing with spare money allows me to last longer. The worst thing about retail investors isn't losing money; it's the feeling of being unable to afford it. Honestly, the research side really doesn't take this money seriously, but here, we can turn the tide, which creates a huge contradiction.

View OriginalReply0

MEVEye

· 9h ago

The $400,000 thing is really incredible. The scientific research community might just treat it as pocket money, and retail investors would be moved to tears.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 9h ago

400,000 USD haha really depends on perspective. My friend went all in and ended up losing his living expenses in a month. This is the magic of the crypto world, right? Some play with spare money, others gamble their life savings. Oh my god, how desperate must someone be to put all their living expenses into it? Honestly, the scariest part of this psychological gap is that no one cares about your story when you're losing money. In the miner group, it's always the same people. They say they fully understand they're playing with fire, but they still went all in.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiSherpa

· 9h ago

$400,000? In the scientific community, that's just a drop in the bucket. In our crypto circle, that's all the assets we have haha. Really, the same amount of money placed in different places means two different things. Risk perception depends entirely on whether you're playing with spare change or going all-in. That's why some sleep soundly while others stay up all night watching the markets. Thinking about it, it's quite ironic. Scale determines mindset, and mindset determines everything. Honestly, this gap didn't form overnight. The underlying logic is right here.

View OriginalReply0