2026-01-13 12:37:46

Switching from one Solana pump token to another mainly depends on the identity of the creator behind the latter — who happens to be the developer of another popular project. The key difference lies in the flow of fees: the newly chosen project directs all creator fees entirely to the ecosystem side, making the project more cohesive. In comparison, the previous one was also good but lacked a mechanism for ecosystem fee feedback. This seemingly small difference actually reflects the project's commitment to long-term ecosystem development.

SOL3,36%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ContractTearjerker

· 01-13 13:07

Fee redistribution to the ecosystem? I've seen this trick too many times. How many actually implement it effectively?

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotBot

· 01-13 13:06

The detail of ecological fees reinvesting back into the ecosystem is something I hadn't considered before. It indeed shows the project's ambition.

View OriginalReply0

NFTArtisanHQ

· 01-13 12:54

honestly the real paradigm shift here isn't the token swap itself—it's recognizing that fee architecture becomes a proof of creative commitment. most devs just extract, yeah? but when you see that artist actually routing fees back into the ecosystem, it's less about tokenomics theater and more about genuine curation intention. the meta-narrative writes itself.

Reply0